FR 2021-03432

The recent announcement in the Federal Register details an open meeting of the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC). The scheduled meeting, slated for March 18, 2021, will be conducted online via Zoom, something that has become increasingly common in the current climate. Such meetings serve as a platform to provide expert advice on the scientific priorities in nuclear science research, a crucial area for both the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation.

General Summary

The document outlines the agenda for the upcoming NSAC meeting, emphasizing its open nature and the opportunity for public participation. This advisory committee meeting will cover various topics including updates from nuclear physics offices, presentations regarding specific scientific charges and programs, and discussions on integrating artificial intelligence with nuclear physics. Additionally, it provides details about how individuals can participate, offering both written and, subject to prior arrangement, oral modes of communication.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue with the document is its lack of detailed financial disclosure. There is a noticeable absence of information on budgetary allocations or spending related to the conduction of this meeting. This omission raises concerns about transparency and accountability, as financial disclosures are important in ensuring there is no misuse of funds or favoritism.

Additionally, the language of the document may be challenging for those not familiar with the technicalities of nuclear science. Terms like "Mo-99 Charge" or "Artificial Intelligence for Nuclear Physics" could perplex the general public. Such jargon may limit the ability of broader audiences to engage thoughtfully with the subject matter.

Concerns about transparency also extend to the process for selecting oral statements from the public. The document does not specify the criteria or decision-making process that will be used, which might lead individuals to question the fairness and inclusivity of their engagement.

Finally, there is no mention of how public feedback, particularly the comments received, will be utilized post-meeting. Understanding how public input influences the committee's considerations is vital for public trust and understanding.

Potential Impact on the Public

The document positions itself as an invitation to the public to engage with scientific discourse that directly affects national priorities in nuclear research. Public participation provides an avenue for concerned citizens to voice opinions and contribute viewpoints, which could potentially influence future research and policy in nuclear science.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in nuclear science—such as researchers, academic institutions, and governmental bodies—there is a clear benefit in contributing to and learning from the discussions facilitated in the meeting. Such dialogues help set the strategic direction for research and development in the nuclear sciences.

Conversely, individuals or groups advocating for increased transparency and public engagement in government scientific policy may view the vague areas in financial disclosure and public comment incorporation as setbacks.

Conclusion

The Federal Register notice provides a crucial opportunity for public interaction with the DOE and NSF's advisory process in nuclear science. While it opens doors for engagement, several issues, particularly surrounding financial transparency and inclusivity in public discourse, need addressing to strengthen trust and participation from both the scientific community and the public.