FR 2021-03386

Overview

Title

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Amended Notice of Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has changed the dates for a special meeting to April 14-15, 2021, instead of February 25-26, 2021, and it will be held in Rockville, Maryland, but people from outside cannot attend.

Summary AI

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke is changing the dates for their upcoming special meeting. Originally scheduled for February 25-26, 2021, the meeting will now take place on April 14-15, 2021. The meeting will still be held at the Neuroscience Center in Rockville, Maryland, and it remains closed to the public. The timing of the meeting will stay the same as initially planned.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10329
Document #: 2021-03386
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10329-10329

AnalysisAI

The document in review is a notice regarding a meeting of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. The purpose of the notice is to inform the public about the change in schedule for an upcoming special emphasis panel meeting that was initially planned for February 25-26, 2021. The new dates for the meeting are April 14-15, 2021, and it will still take place at the Neuroscience Center in Rockville, Maryland. The meeting times remain the same, and it is important to note that the meeting will be closed to the public.

Summary of the Document

The notice serves a straightforward function: to inform of the rescheduling of a specific meeting. It provides the revised dates and confirms that the meeting times and location have not changed. The focus of the meeting is to advance the careers of diverse researchers, indicating an alignment with broader efforts to enhance diversity in neurological research fields. This demonstrates an ongoing institutional commitment to supporting diversity, which may have broader implications for research innovation and inclusivity.

Significant Issues or Concerns

From the text provided, there are no immediate or significant issues apparent in the document. The notice is clear and straightforward, detailing the change in dates effectively. It does not hint at any favoritism towards particular organizations or individuals, nor does it contain complex or opaque language that might confuse the public. Thus, its function as a rescheduling notice is well executed.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, the impact of this document is likely minimal, given that the meeting is closed to public attendance. However, it does communicate transparency regarding the activities of the National Institutes of Health, particularly the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, which maintains trust in how government agencies inform citizens of their operations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in or affected by the panel meeting, this document is of critical importance. Researchers, policymakers, and others engaged with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke may need to adjust their schedules or expectations based on the new meeting dates. This rescheduling could also affect the timeline of grant reviews, project approvals, or other research initiatives that hinge on the outcomes of these meetings. Positively, the focus on advancing the careers of diverse researchers may lead to increased opportunities for underrepresented groups in this field. However, the closure of the meeting to the public might limit transparency for those who wish to understand more about the decision-making processes within the institute.

Overall, the notice performs its intended function effectively, providing relevant stakeholders with necessary and clear information about a scheduling change. It reflects the operational details and priorities of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke while aligning with broader institutional goals focused on diversity and inclusion.

Issues

  • • No specific details about potential wasteful spending are provided in the notice.

  • • The notice does not specify any particular organizations or individuals being favored.

  • • The language used in the notice is clear and straightforward, with the primary change in meeting dates clearly stated.

  • • The notice does not include any overly complex or difficult-to-understand language.

  • • The notice appropriately communicates the change in meeting dates and maintains the current meeting time.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 183
Sentences: 7
Entities: 30

Language

Nouns: 60
Verbs: 9
Adjectives: 1
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.13
Average Sentence Length:
26.14
Token Entropy:
4.25
Readability (ARI):
14.32

Reading Time

less than a minute