Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government got some papers from energy companies about how they share and charge for electricity. Some of the dates and words in these papers might have mistakes, like saying something will happen in the year 9998, or using confusing words. People can say what they think about these papers until early March 2021.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced the receipt of various filings related to energy rates, agreements, and certifications. Companies like Coso Battery Storage, Tri-State Generation, Flat Ridge 3 Wind Energy, and many others have submitted filings for things such as self-certification and compliance relating to rate changes and service agreements. These filings are open for public comments until March 5, 2021, or March 4, 2021, depending on the individual docket. The submissions and their details can be accessed via FERC's eLibrary system by searching the relevant docket numbers.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that outlines various filings related to energy rates, agreements, and certifications as received on February 12, 2021. These filings represent a diverse array of energy industry stakeholders, including companies such as Coso Battery Storage, LLC, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Flat Ridge 3 Wind Energy, LLC, and many more. The filings are made available to the public for comments, with deadlines for comments set as either March 4 or March 5, 2021, depending on the docket number.
General Summary
The document details a list of filings submitted to FERC concerning compliance, amendments, and certifications involving wholesale energy rates or agreements. These include self-certifications of "Exempt Wholesale Generators" (EG), compliance with existing agreements, amendments to service agreements, and new financial arrangements to be undertaken by varied energy corporations. The list is exhaustive and provides specifics on each filing, including docket numbers, descriptions, filing dates, accession numbers, and deadlines for public commentary.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One notable concern is that several filings mention effective dates that appear outdated or unusually futuristic, such as June 1, 2011, December 31, 9998, and August 10, 2020. These dates may reflect clerical oversights, placeholders, or errors that could lead to misunderstandings or administrative complications. Additionally, some language within the descriptions, such as reference to "Revisions to Joint OATT to Implement NFEETS," could be cumbersome for those not knowledgeable about regulatory parlance or specific orders, posing challenges for public understanding.
Repeated submissions referencing the Southeast Energy Exchange Market Agreement across different applicants might suggest a need to scrutinize the broader implications and fairness of this agreement. It is essential to ensure that this arrangement does not unduly benefit a particular group of stakeholders over others. Furthermore, vague or incomplete descriptions, such as Hummel Station, LLC's filing description ending abruptly, hint at possible typographical or clerical mistakes that require resolution for clarity.
Impact on the Public
The filings hold substantial implications for the public, primarily affecting energy rates and the operational landscape of energy markets. Public commentary opportunities allow stakeholders and citizens to express their concerns or support, influencing decisions that could impact regional energy costs, availability, and sustainability.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For energy providers and companies involved in the filings, these changes could signal new operational standards, potential revisions in financial or service agreements, and shifts in regulatory compliance requirements. Companies like Duke Energy, PJM Interconnection, and others could experience administrative burdens or financial consequences depending on the outcome of their proposals.
Potential rate changes or amendments may positively or negatively influence the consumers served by these utility companies. For example, customers might benefit from improved service agreements or face higher costs due to new tariff structures. Regulatory bodies and advocacy groups will also view these filings as critical checkpoints to ensure that all actions align with broader objectives of market fairness and consumer protection.
The document thus serves as a regulatory juncture where multiple entities with vested interests engage in shaping the impending energy landscape, highlighting the significance of public scrutiny and participation in these processes.
Issues
• Many of the effective dates for filings refer to dates significantly in the past, such as 6/1/2011, 8/10/2020, and 12/31/9998, which might indicate clerical errors.
• The description 'Revisions to Joint OATT to Implement NFEETS to be effective 12/31/9998' is likely a typographical error or placeholder, as 9998 is not a practical year.
• Language such as 'Supplemental Order 864 Comp. Filing ER20-2572' could be overly complex for those not familiar with regulatory jargon or specific orders.
• Repeated references to the Southeast Energy Exchange Market Agreement across multiple filings may deserve attention to ensure this agreement does not disproportionately benefit specific applicants.
• The reference to a document to 'Request fo' in one of Hummel Station, LLC's filings is incomplete and unclear, suggesting a possible typographical or clerical error.