Overview
Title
BOST2 Hydroelectric LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications
Agencies
ELI5 AI
BOST2 Hydroelectric wants to see if they can build a big project in Wisconsin to make electricity using water, and they are asking for comments and ideas from people. They can't start building yet, but people can say what they think about it or suggest their own ideas within two months of this notice.
Summary AI
BOST2 Hydroelectric LLC has submitted an application for a preliminary permit to explore the feasibility of the Shawno County Pump Storage Project in Wisconsin. This project would involve constructing several reservoirs, tunnels, and a powerhouse to generate electricity. The application gives the company priority to file a full license application later but doesn't allow them to start construction. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is now inviting public comments, motions, and competing applications related to this project within 60 days of this notice's issuance.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document is a notice regarding BOST2 Hydroelectric LLC's application for a preliminary permit to assess the feasibility of a proposed hydroelectric project in Shawano County, Wisconsin. The notice serves to inform the public and stakeholders about the project details, the process of application, and an invitation for comments and any competing applications. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is overseeing the process and has provided specific guidelines on how interested parties can engage.
General Summary
The proposed hydroelectric project will be located near the Embarrass River and involves significant construction, including reservoirs, tunnels, and a powerhouse. With a total project capacity of 666 megawatts, the Shawno County Pump Storage Project aims to generate around 1,450 gigawatt-hours of electricity annually. This application, if approved, would give BOST2 Hydroelectric LLC priority to later file for a full license, without authorizing any land-disturbing work.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several notable issues accompany this document. Firstly, there is a lack of information regarding the project's costs and potential funding sources. This omission might be a concern for those worrying about financial accountability and resource allocation. Moreover, the detailed technical descriptions of the project may not be easily accessible to the general public, hindering broader community engagement.
Another point of concern is the absence of specific deadlines for public commentary and interventions, as the notice only provides a 60-day window from issuance without precisely dating it. This may cause confusion among stakeholders who need clear timelines to prepare their responses.
Importantly, the document does not mention any environmental assessments or studies on community impacts, crucial for evaluating the project's feasibility and gauging its comprehensive effects on local environments and communities. Finally, while the contact information is provided, email addresses could aid in more efficient, accessible communication in today's digital context.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this notice may affect local communities, particularly in Shawano County, where the proposed project resides. For the public, understanding the project's scope and feasibility is essential since it can potentially alter the local landscape and ecosystem. However, the technical nature of the documentation and lack of detailed assessments might limit meaningful public engagement and contribution.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the stakeholders directly involved, such as local residents, government officials, and environmental groups, the document presents both opportunities and challenges. Residents might have concerns about how the project affects their surroundings, while governmental and environmental stakeholders need a more comprehensive analysis of benefits versus potential ecological impacts.
Businesses and industries related to construction and energy could see positive impacts through the project. However, they will have to navigate the application process, impacting timelines and potentially incurring additional costs if the requirements are not clear or well managed.
In summary, while the document lays the groundwork for a potential hydroelectric project that could bring energy benefits, several gaps in detail might hinder effective public participation and evaluation. Adjustments in communication and transparency, along with more vigorous environmental and community assessments, would likely be beneficial.
Issues
• The document does not specify the costs or funding sources for the project, which could be a concern for public accountability and assessment of potential wasteful spending.
• The description of the project's technical components is highly technical and may not be easily understood by the general public, which could limit public engagement and understanding.
• The deadlines for filing comments and motions to intervene are mentioned but not specifically dated, which might cause confusion for stakeholders who need to know the exact timeline for participation.
• There is no mention of environmental assessments or community impact studies, which are important for a comprehensive evaluation of the project's feasibility and potential impacts.
• Contact information provided is clear, but it might be better to also include email contacts to facilitate communication, especially in a digital context.
• The process and requirements for submitting competing applications are referenced to 18 CFR 4.36 without being explicitly detailed, which could be challenging for new applicants unfamiliar with these regulations.