FR 2021-03276

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has a bunch of energy companies saying they want to change the way they do things or stop doing some things. People can write in if they disagree or have questions, but they have to do it by the deadline.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received several electric corporate and rate filings. These filings include applications for authorization under the Federal Power Act, notices of tariff amendments, and requests for tariff cancellations from different energy companies like PJM Interconnection, LLC, AEP Texas Inc., and Powervine Energy, LLC. The filing numbers, company names, descriptions, and deadlines for comments are provided in the notice. Interested parties have until the specified comment dates to intervene or protest these proceedings, as per the Commission's regulations.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10044
Document #: 2021-03276
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10044-10045

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register details a series of filings received by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These filings are related to electric corporate activities and rate changes submitted by various energy companies. The document provides information such as docket numbers, applicants, descriptions of the filings, dates, and deadlines for public comments. The applications generally pertain to tariff changes, requests for authorization under the Federal Power Act, and notices regarding changes in status.

General Summary

This notice communicates to the public and interested parties about recent filings received by FERC. It includes a comprehensive list of docket numbers, each associated with a specific electric company or project, and offers a description of the type of filing. Importantly, it also specifies deadlines for comments or protests, indicating the opportunity for public participation in the regulatory process.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are a few concerns worth noting regarding this document. Firstly, the narrative is dense with technical jargon and references to specific legal terms and regulatory codes that may not be easily understood by those without expertise in the field of energy regulation. This complexity can hinder the ability of the general public to grasp the significance of the filings or how they might influence their electricity services or environmental policies.

The document also lacks an abstract, which could have simplified the extraction of essential points for readers. The brief instructions for public intervention or protest suggest navigating external resources that may not be accessible or user-friendly to all, potentially limiting public engagement in these proceedings.

Impact on the Public

The impact of these filings on the public is multifaceted. Generally, such regulatory filings can influence how electricity is priced and managed, subsequently affecting consumer utility bills. While this document does not mention specific rates or price changes, the outcome of these proceedings may affect energy availability, pricing structures, and even the sustainability initiatives within certain regions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as electric companies and consumers in the energy sector, these filings carry significant consequence. Energy companies are directly involved as their future operations, pricing, and compliance measures depend on the outcomes of these filings. Positive impacts include potential efficiency improvements, new partnerships, or service enhancements.

Conversely, there could be negative impacts for certain stakeholders. For example, regulatory changes could impose additional burdens on smaller energy providers, or lead to increased costs for consumers if tariffs are adjusted unfavorably. Environmental or consumer advocacy groups might view these as opportunities to press for renewable energy incentives or safeguards against price hikes.

Conclusion

Overall, while this document is a crucial piece for regulatory transparency and operational governance within the energy sector, its complex nature necessitates greater clarity for broader public understanding. It serves as a reminder of the essential role regulators and public participation play in shaping the energy landscape, where decisions made in these filings can reverberate through policy, pricing, and environmental stewardship.

Issues

  • • The document does not explicitly mention any instances of spending; it's primarily about notices of filings with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

  • • The information is heavily jargon-laden and complex, making it difficult for individuals without expertise in energy regulation to understand.

  • • There are multiple docket numbers and filings mentioned with specific legal and regulatory references that may not be accessible or understandable without prior knowledge of FERC procedures.

  • • The instructions for intervention or protest in the proceedings are brief and refer to external resources, which might not be user-friendly or provide immediate clarity to laypersons.

  • • The document lacks an abstract, which could summarize the key points for easier comprehension.

  • • The language is formal and bureaucratic, which, while appropriate, might be perceived as overly complex by the general public.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 2,170
Sentences: 147
Entities: 293

Language

Nouns: 791
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 257

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.30
Average Sentence Length:
14.76
Token Entropy:
4.52
Readability (ARI):
18.10

Reading Time

about 7 minutes