FR 2021-03253

Overview

Title

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institutes of Health had a private meeting to talk about school grants for doctors in training. The meeting was secret so that everyone’s personal information stayed private.

Summary AI

The National Institutes of Health announced a closed meeting of the NIGMS Initial Review Group Training and Workforce Development Subcommittee, which will take place from February 25 to 26, 2021. The meeting intends to review and evaluate predoctoral training grant applications and will be held via video at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD. The meeting is closed to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy. This notice was published with short notice due to constraints related to the review and funding process.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10094
Document #: 2021-03253
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10094-10094

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announcing a closed meeting to be held by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Initial Review Group. This meeting is specifically for the Training and Workforce Development Subcommittee to review and evaluate predoctoral training grant applications. Scheduled for February 25-26, 2021, the meeting will take place virtually at the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland. According to the relevant legal provisions, the meeting is closed to the public to protect confidential information related to trade secrets or commercial properties, as well as personal privacy.

General Summary

The notification informs the public of an upcoming closed meeting intended for reviewing grant applications focused on predoctoral training. Participants will gather online, reflecting current health and safety measures. Despite being a routine procedure, the notice highlights its publication within a short timeframe due to deadlines within the funding cycle. The document serves as both a formal advisory of the meeting and a legal reassurance that privacy and confidentiality will be respected.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues are noteworthy:

  • Timing of the Notice: The notice was published less than 15 days before the meeting, which raises concerns about the adequacy of public awareness. This could limit the opportunity for the stakeholders who might have an interest or concern about the meeting's outcomes.

  • Confidentiality Measures: While the document notes the necessity for confidentiality, it lacks a description of the specific measures that will be employed to protect the sensitive information discussed. Such transparency could reassure stakeholders about the integrity and responsibility of the meeting.

  • Understanding of the Programs: The mention of various federal assistance program numbers without clear definition might lead to confusion among those not familiar with these government initiatives. Greater context or explanation could help demystify these references for the general public.

  • Contact Information: The email address provided uses an older format, which might seem outdated and detract from the formality and professionalism expected in such official communications. An address more consistent with current official formatting might better inspire confidence amongst the readers.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document represents the efforts of the NIH to maintain transparency about its internal processes in managing grant applications. The public is generally assured that grant processes protect sensitive information and personal privacy. However, the short notice might suggest to some a potential lack of opportunity for public engagement or oversight, even if the meeting itself is necessarily private.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For those directly involved in the grants management process, such as applicants, reviewers, and associated institutions, the meeting is crucial. It provides a formal setting for grant evaluations, impacting funding decisions and opportunities for research advancements.

However, the closed nature of the meeting underscores confidentiality and privacy issues that could reassure applicants about proprietary material but also leaves them without insight into peer review, potentially leading to concerns over transparency in decision-making processes.

Overall, the notice reflects standard procedural practice while highlighting areas where communication and transparency could be improved to better serve both general public interests and specific stakeholder demands.

Issues

  • • The notice is published less than 15 days prior to the meeting, potentially limiting public awareness and participation.

  • • The document mentions that the meeting is closed to the public to protect sensitive information; however, it does not elaborate on what specific measures are in place to ensure the confidentiality of grant applications.

  • • The notice includes a non-exhaustive list of program numbers related to federal assistance, which might be unclear to readers who are not familiar with these programs and their purposes.

  • • The contact information provided uses an outdated email format typical of federated resources; a more official NIH domain address could be more transparent and reassuring to the public.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 383
Sentences: 13
Entities: 51

Language

Nouns: 153
Verbs: 16
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.26
Average Sentence Length:
29.46
Token Entropy:
4.80
Readability (ARI):
21.28

Reading Time

about a minute or two