Overview
Title
FY 2021 Competitive Funding Opportunity: Low or No Emission Grant Program
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Transit Administration has $180 million to help buy or lease buses that are good for the environment, and local governments or tribes can ask for this money until April 12, 2021. They want people to use these buses to help fight climate change and make public transport cleaner.
Summary AI
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is offering $180 million in competitive grants for the fiscal year 2021 under the Low or No Emission Grant Program. These grants are aimed at supporting the purchase or lease of low or no-emission vehicles with advanced technology for transit operations. Eligible applicants like states, local government authorities, and tribes can apply electronically through GRANTS.GOV until April 12, 2021. The program aligns with federal goals to enhance sustainable public transportation and address climate change challenges.
Abstract
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) announces the opportunity to apply for $180 million in competitive grants under the fiscal year (FY) 2021 Low or No Emission Grant Program (Low-No Program) (Federal Assistance Listing: 20.526). As required by Federal public transportation law, funds will be awarded competitively for the purchase or lease of low or noemission vehicles that use advanced technologies for transit revenue operations, including related equipment or facilities. Projects may include costs incidental to the acquisition of buses or to the construction of facilities, such as the costs of related workforce development and training activities, and project administration expenses. FTA may award additional funding that is made available to the program prior to the announcement of project selections.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document is a notice from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) about the availability of $180 million in competitive grants for the fiscal year 2021 under the Low or No Emission Grant Program. This program aims to help public transportation sectors transition to cleaner and more sustainable technologies, such as low or no-emission vehicles. Eligible applicants include states, local government authorities, and tribal entities. The application process is conducted electronically through the GRANTS.GOV portal, with a submission deadline of April 12, 2021. This initiative is part of broader federal goals to support sustainable public transportation and tackle climate change.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document presents a meticulously detailed process but includes several areas that could lead to confusion. It uses technical jargon and acronyms like SF-424, DUNS, and DBE without adequate explanation for readers unfamiliar with these terms. This might alienate smaller or less resourced applicants.
One standout issue is the requirement to demonstrate "legal, financial, and technical capabilities." The document does not delineate how these should be evidenced, which could lead to subjective interpretations and unequal evaluation during the review process. Further ambiguity is observed in the phrase "net project cost," which is crucial for understanding federal share contributions for projects but is not clearly defined, potentially leading to misunderstandings about budgetary obligations.
The document also indicates that significant flexibility exists for entities partnering in proposed projects, with changes needing FTA's written approval. However, it lacks clarity on the process or criteria for obtaining such approvals.
Notably, the "Demonstration of Need" criterion requires information about the condition of vehicles but does not specify what determines "minimum useful life," which could vary across applicants and lead to inconsistent evaluations. Similarly, the lack of detail in demonstrating local and regional prioritization creates room for subjective determinations.
Impact on the Public
The general public could potentially benefit from improved public transportation systems that are more environmentally friendly, reducing emissions and saving energy. This aligns with broader climate change goals and could improve air quality and urban health environments.
However, the complex application process and nuanced requirements may deter smaller organizations or those with less experience in federal grants from applying, potentially limiting diversity in project proposals and excluding communities with varying needs across the nation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
State and local governmental authorities and Indian tribes stand to gain considerable financial support to transition to advanced transportation technologies, a key milestone in promoting public health and sustainability. This funding may lead to job creation in the transportation and technology sectors, serving an economic benefit as the workforce becomes increasingly skilled in advanced technologies.
Negative Impacts:
For smaller transit systems or entities with limited experience in applying for federal grants, the complex requirements and application process could be significant hurdles. The lack of detailed guidance in some areas could lead to excluding potential applicants unable to fully meet the submission criteria or demonstrating sufficient local financial support.
By addressing these issues proactively, the FTA could ensure broader participation and potentially more innovative proposals, allowing the benefits of this program to reach a wider range of stakeholders and contributing meaningfully to emission reductions across diverse communities.
Financial Assessment
The document outlines a funding opportunity under the Federal Transit Administration's Low or No Emission Grant Program for fiscal year 2021. This program aims to distribute $180 million in competitive grants to support the acquisition and development of low and no-emission transit vehicles and related facilities.
Financial Summary
The funding for the program is comprised of multiple allocations. Initially, federal transportation law authorized $55 million for the program. Subsequently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 added $125 million, bringing the total available funding to $180 million. This reflects a concerted effort to support environmentally friendly transit solutions.
Allocation Details
In fiscal year 2020, the program received substantial interest, with applications for 147 projects totaling $513 million in requests. However, only 41 projects were funded, amounting to a total of $130 million distributed. The largest grant to a single applicant that year was approximately $7 million, and no state received more than 5.4% of the total funding. This distribution strategy suggests a focus on spreading resources across multiple projects and locations.
Connection to Issues
One financial concern highlighted is around the maximum federal share for projects, capped at either 85% or 90% of the net project cost. However, the document does not clarify what constitutes the "net project cost," which can lead to potential misunderstandings. This lack of definition can create challenges in budgeting and compliance, as applicants may have varied interpretations of eligible costs.
Additionally, the document mentions projects with prime contracts exceeding $250,000 must comply with specific Department of Transportation regulations, emphasizing accountability and stringent oversight for larger financial awards. However, the process for changes in partnerships that might impact financial structures lacks detailed guidance, leaving room for interpretation and potential administrative hurdles.
Compliance and Restrictions
Applicants are also warned not to expect waivers for Buy America regulations but are not provided with guidelines on managing projects where compliance proves difficult. This could lead to apprehensions about project feasibility under financial and regulatory constraints. Furthermore, the proposed "scalable funding options" could lead to confusion, as no clear guidelines are offered for scaling projects or defining minimum thresholds for financial eligibility.
Overall, while substantial funding is available under this program, the document highlights several areas where greater clarity and specific guidance are necessary to ensure effective and efficient use of financial resources.
Issues
• The document uses technical jargon and acronyms (e.g., SF-424, DUNS, DBE) without always providing definitions or explanations, which could be confusing for readers not familiar with the terms.
• The eligibility criteria require applicants to demonstrate 'legal, financial, and technical capabilities,' but it does not specify how these capabilities should be demonstrated, leaving room for ambiguity and subjective interpretation.
• The document specifies that the maximum federal share for certain projects is 90% or 85% of the net project cost, but it does not explain what constitutes the 'net project cost,' which could lead to misunderstandings.
• The language regarding the partnership with entities seems to allow significant flexibility, stating that changes require FTA written approval without clearly defining how such approvals are obtained or what guidelines need to be followed.
• The criteria for 'Demonstration of Need' require information about vehicle condition but do not specify how 'minimum useful life' should be determined, potentially leading to inconsistency.
• The description of the 'Planning and Local/Regional Prioritization' lacks specifics on what constitutes evidence of priority, making it potentially subjective and inconsistent among applicants.
• The section on 'Local Financial Commitment' references the requirement for proof of local fund availability but lacks a standardized form or template, leaving applicants to interpret what is sufficient proof.
• The requirement that no waivers should be expected for Buy America regulations is clearly stated, but it lacks guidance on how to handle exceptions or how to proceed if compliance is unfeasible.
• The document allows for 'scalable funding options' but does not provide clear guidelines on how to scale the project or define minimum thresholds for eligibility, potentially leading to confusion in budgeting.
• The guidelines mention that indirect expenses must be consistent with Governmentwide Uniform Administrative Requirements (2 CFR part 200), but the document does not provide a reference or accessible link, which could be a barrier to compliance.