FR 2021-03156

Overview

Title

Walden Hydro, LLC; Notice of Application Ready for Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and Prescriptions

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is checking if a water-powered electricity project in New York should get a new license to keep working. People have 60 days to say what they think about it.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced that Walden Hydro, LLC has filed an application for a new major license for the Walden Hydroelectric Project in New York. The project is located on the Wallkill River and involves existing structures but does not occupy federal land. Public comments and recommendations on the application are invited within 60 days of the notice date, with replies due within 105 days. FERC will conduct an environmental analysis following updated regulations, and the project is proposed to continue in a run-of-river mode without operational changes.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9923
Document #: 2021-03156
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9923-9924

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released a notice regarding an application from Walden Hydro, LLC for a new major license for the Walden Hydroelectric Project located on the Wallkill River in New York. The project, which does not occupy any federal land, involves existing structures and equipment. The notice opens the floor for public comments, recommendations, and potential conditions to be submitted within 60 days, with replies due 105 days after the notice date.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A review of the notice highlights several issues:

  1. Environmental Impact Transparency: The notice lacks specific information on the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. This omission could lead to public concern regarding transparency and awareness of the environmental consequences of hydropower operations.

  2. Technical Complexity: The document provides intricate technical details about the project, such as precise specifications of the turbines and transmission lines. These details might be challenging for individuals without technical expertise to fully comprehend, possibly hindering informed public engagement.

  3. Inconsistent Capacity Statements: There's inconsistency in the project's reported power generation capacity. According to the application, the total rated capacity is 2,110 kilowatts, but the maximum achievable output is lower at 1,640 kilowatts. The lack of explanation for this discrepancy may cause confusion or concern regarding the project's performance.

  4. Ownership Transfer: It is noted that ownership of Walden Hydro, LLC was transferred from Enel Green Power North America, Inc. to Hydroland, Inc. The notice does not clarify the reasons behind this change, which could prompt speculation or uncertainty about the transaction's motives or impacts.

  5. Timeline Clarity: The procedural schedule lacks explicit detail, potentially leaving stakeholders uncertain about necessary steps and deadlines, which could impede effective participation or compliance.

Public and Stakeholder Impact

Broadly, this document allows for public involvement by inviting comments and recommendations, enabling citizens and local entities to influence decisions that could affect their communities and ecosystems. However, the complexity and potential gaps in information may limit effective participation to those with specialized knowledge or resources to interpret the data.

For stakeholders like environmental groups, the omission of detailed environmental analyses might be concerning, potentially motivating them to demand more information or advocate for stricter environmental assessments. Conversely, industry stakeholders, such as energy companies and engineers, might appreciate the opportunity for development, though they too must navigate technical complexities and ensure compliance with procedural requirements.

Local communities potentially affected by the project will find this notice crucial as it informs them of ongoing developments. It also provides them with a platform to voice concerns, especially about environmental or economic effects, such as changes in local water management or energy availability.

In conclusion, while the notice offers a structured avenue for public engagement and regulatory compliance, the effectiveness of these processes may hinge on the accessibility and clarity of information provided to all interested parties.

Issues

  • • The notice does not provide specific information on potential environmental impacts, which could be considered unclear or lacking in transparency.

  • • The technical details of the project, such as the specifications of the turbines and the transmission line, are quite complex and might be difficult for a layperson to understand.

  • • There is an inconsistency in the stated capacities of the turbines: the total rated capacity is listed as 2,110 kW in the license application, but the achievable capacity is reported as 1,640 kW without a clear explanation for the discrepancy.

  • • It is not immediately clear why Enel Green Power North America's ownership was transferred to Hydroland, Inc., potentially raising questions about the reasons behind this transfer.

  • • The timeline for procedural steps and deadlines is not explicit and might benefit from more clarity, such as clearly outlining each step and expected dates.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,504
Sentences: 56
Entities: 161

Language

Nouns: 490
Verbs: 94
Adjectives: 59
Adverbs: 17
Numbers: 116

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.01
Average Sentence Length:
26.86
Token Entropy:
5.51
Readability (ARI):
18.89

Reading Time

about 5 minutes