FR 2021-03078

Overview of the Notice

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is reviewing a petition from the Norfolk Southern Corporation to modify or discontinue certain railroad signal systems in their Blue Ridge Division. The request, filed in January 2021, aims to eliminate a traffic control system (TCS) on some tracks, citing that operations no longer demand this system. The involved rail lines are part of the Guyandot River Branch Line and the Morri Branch Line, where adjustments include converting to a different operational rule and retiring slide fences.

Invitation for Public Comment

The FRA has called for public participation by soliciting comments on the proposed changes. Interested individuals or entities have until April 5, 2021, to submit their feedback through various channels, such as online submissions, mail, or fax. Although a public hearing is not planned, the FRA will consider holding one if there is a significant request from the public.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The notice raises several potential concerns:

1. Lack of Financial Information: The document doesn't disclose any financial implications associated with the proposed discontinuance or modification. Understanding the cost implications would help assess whether the move is economically justified or if it risks wasteful spending.

2. Safety Implications: There is no discussion about potential impacts on safety due to the removal of the TCS. Without insights into safety considerations, stakeholders might be concerned about how these changes could increase risks to operations or public safety.

3. Technical Jargon: The notice includes technical terms such as "NS Rule 171 operation" and references to specific mileposts and operating changes that might not be easily understood by individuals unfamiliar with railroad operations. This could alienate the general public who might otherwise wish to engage with the proceedings.

4. Operational Efficiency: The document does not thoroughly address how these changes might affect the efficiency of the railroad operations. Public understanding of the operational improvements or challenges arising from these modifications is critical for informed commentary.

5. Access to Context and Definitions: Industry-specific jargon and locations are mentioned without additional context or definitions, potentially complicating comprehension for the general audience.

Potential Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders

The discontinuance or modification of the signal system could have varied impacts:

• Public: Residents and businesses located near railway lines might be affected by changes in train operations, potentially impacting their safety and daily life. However, without concrete details on safety measures or operational improvements, public perception could lean towards concern.

• Industry Stakeholders: For railroad operators, discontinuing an outdated or unnecessary system may streamline operations and reduce costs. Stakeholders with a stake in railway operations may view these modifications as a positive move towards more efficient governance.

• Regulatory and Safety Bodies: These entities have the responsibility to ensure any changes prioritize safety and compliance with existing regulations. The absence of explicit safety details might necessitate further scrutiny from such groups to guarantee that modifications align with safety standards.

In conclusion, while the notice outlines Norfolk Southern Corporation's request to modernize part of its railway system, several concerns such as safety, financial implications, and clarity of communication remain unaddressed. These gaps in the document may limit effective public engagement without additional context or transparency provided by the FRA or the applicant.