FR 2021-03077

Overview of the Notice

The document provides information pertaining to an application submitted by Norfolk Southern Corporation to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). This application seeks approval to discontinue or modify the current railroad signal system on a section of the Dry Fork Branch of the Blue Ridge Division, stretching from milepost 10.3 to milepost 144.4. The proposed changes include the removal of a traffic control system and a shift to an alternative method of operation, specifically referred to as NS Rule 171.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue is the document's lack of specificity regarding the criteria the FRA uses to determine that a public hearing is unnecessary. For individuals or entities who may be affected by this change, this absence of transparency could be concerning. Moreover, the technical language used in the notice, such as terms like "TCS," "control points," and "slide fences," may be unclear to those not versed in railroad operations, potentially limiting broader public understanding and engagement.

Additionally, the notice outlines multiple methods for submitting comments to the FRA, including online submissions, fax, mail, and hand delivery. However, it doesn't indicate which of these methods would be most efficient or preferred, leaving interested parties without guidance on the best way to make their voices heard.

Finally, the document does not clarify the potential safety or operational impacts of discontinuing the traffic control system. This omission could be especially worrying for stakeholders who place a premium on safety and reliability in railway operations.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this notice could impact the public by affecting how railroad operations are conducted along a significant segment of the Blue Ridge Division. While some may view the proposed changes as a technical adjustment primarily affecting the corporation and regulatory bodies, others might be concerned about safety implications, especially if they live near the railroad or frequently travel through areas affected by the changes.

For specific stakeholders, such as local residents, train operators, and businesses relying on rail transport, the discontinuation or modification of the signal system could have deeper ramifications. These stakeholders might be particularly interested in how these changes could influence train schedules, operational safety, or service reliability. Without clear information about the potential impacts, stakeholders may experience uncertainty or apprehension regarding how the changes will affect their interests.

Conclusion

Overall, while the notice outlines an important procedural change, its effectiveness in communicating vital information to a broader audience is limited by technical jargon, a lack of detailed justification for procedural decisions, and insufficient clarity regarding potential impacts. Addressing these issues might better inform the public and facilitate more meaningful participation in the decision-making process.