Overview
Title
Information Collection Request Submission for OMB Review; Reopening of Comment Period
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Peace Corps is asking for more time for people to give their thoughts on a special form they want to use, because they accidentally didn't leave enough time before. Now, everyone has until March 18, 2021, to share their ideas by emailing Virginia.
Summary AI
The Peace Corps has announced the reopening of the comment period for a document initially published on December 7, 2020, in the Federal Register. The original document requested comments on an information collection request for review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but the comment period was mistakenly only 30 days instead of 60 days. This notice extends the comment period by an additional 30 days, allowing feedback to be submitted until March 18, 2021. Comments should be directed to Virginia Burke via the provided email.
Abstract
The Peace Corps published a document in the Federal Register of December 7, 2020, concerning request for comments on an information collection request submission for OMB Review. The purpose of this notice is to reopen the document comment period.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register involves the Peace Corps' announcement regarding the reopening of a comment period for an information collection request. Initially published on December 7, 2020, the original notice sought public feedback within a 30-day window, which closed on January 6, 2021. This period, however, should have been 60 days, and thus the comment period has been reopened to allow an additional 30 days for public input, with a new deadline set for March 18, 2021.
General Concerns and Impact
One significant issue with the document is the lack of specific information about the nature or scope of the information collection request. This omission makes it difficult for the public to understand what exactly is being proposed and its potential impacts or necessity. Without such details, effectively engaging with the comment period becomes a challenge.
The document does not provide financial information regarding the reopening of the comment period. This lack of transparency raises questions about whether extending the comment period incurs additional costs or resource allocations, which may be of interest to taxpayers and stakeholders.
Another point for concern is the format requirement for submitting comments via email, which dictates that submissions must be in text rather than attachments. This directive could be more explicit, clarifying if other standard formats are acceptable, such as PDFs, provided they are not attached.
Implications for Public and Stakeholders
This reopening of the comment period impacts the general public by offering another opportunity to participate in the decision-making process related to this information request. For those interested or affected by Peace Corps activities, this extension provides additional time to voice concerns, support, or suggestions.
Specific stakeholders, including potential volunteers, current Peace Corps staff, and affiliated organizations, may find this reopening beneficial as it allows for further deliberation on issues that might directly affect their operations or involvement with the Peace Corps. Such stakeholders would need to pay close attention to how their input might influence the Peace Corps' potential policy changes or approaches.
Post-Comment Period Considerations
A notable concern is a lack of clarity regarding the consequences of not submitting comments by the March 18 deadline and what procedural steps follow this comment period. Details about what actions will be taken based on the feedback received or how decisions will be made would enhance transparency.
Providing clear information about the implications of the pending comment period outcome would further engage the public and encourage meaningful participation. Understanding what happens post-comment period can motivate informed contributions and ensure community voices are adequately represented in Peace Corps decisions.
Issues
• The document lacks specific information about the nature of the information collection request, which limits the ability to assess its impact or necessity.
• No financial details are provided, so it's unclear if the reopening of the comment period incurs any additional costs or resources.
• The statement 'Email comments must be made in text and not in attachments' could be more explicit about whether this means plain text only or if other standard formats are acceptable (e.g., PDF without attachments).
• The contact section provides an email and phone number for Virginia Burke without explaining her role in the process beyond her title. Clarification on her responsibilities or decision-making power would improve transparency.
• Clarification is needed on what the implications are if comments are not submitted by March 18, 2021, or what happens post-comment period.