FR 2021-03037

Overview

Title

Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FERC is asking people to share their thoughts on whether to change the size of a water project area in Nebraska, adding more land for public fun and taking some away. If anyone wants to say something about it, they need to do so by March 11, 2021.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is reviewing an application from the Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District to amend the project boundary of the Kingsley Dam Hydroelectric Project. The amendment aims to adjust the boundaries by adding around 3,400 acres and removing about 900 acres, which results in a net increase of 2,500 acres. This change is proposed to better align with project usage needs, including public access and recreation. Individuals interested in commenting, protesting, or intervening in this process must do so by March 11, 2021, following FERC's submission guidelines.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9501
Document #: 2021-03037
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9501-9502

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is considering an application by the Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District to amend the boundaries of the Kingsley Dam Hydroelectric Project. This project is located on the North Platte and Platte Rivers in Nebraska, spanning several counties. The proposed amendment would increase the project area by a net total of 2,500 acres, accounting for the addition of 3,400 acres and the removal of 900 acres.

General Overview

The purpose of this boundary amendment is to ensure the project area aligns better with its operational needs, including aspects like public access and recreational activities. As laid out, the amendment seeks to balance the use of land for hydroelectric power production while accommodating other community and environmental interests. This review by FERC allows stakeholders and the public to voice their opinions or objections.

Issues and Concerns

One significant concern regarding this document is its complexity, stemming from both legal jargon and technical specifications related to energy regulation. Such complexity may pose a barrier to individuals who lack expertise in these areas, making it challenging for them to fully grasp the implications of the proposed changes.

The extensive contact information and submission guidelines add to this complexity. While providing detailed instructions for public participation is important, the level of detail could be overwhelming for the average individual, potentially discouraging them from participating in the decision-making process.

Moreover, the document lacks a discussion on the potential environmental and community impacts of the boundary amendment. While it is clear which areas will be added or removed from the project, what this means for local ecosystems and nearby communities is not addressed.

Broader Public Impact

For the general public, this document highlights a significant decision involving land and water management in Nebraska. By altering the boundaries of the hydroelectric project, FERC and the Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District are making changes that could affect local water resources, recreational opportunities, and property usage.

Those within the project area who utilize these lands for recreation or live nearby might be directly impacted by the changes. The provision of lands for recreational use could provide positive community benefits, enhancing public access and enjoyment. Conversely, there may be concerns about environmental disruption or changes in land value resulting from altering the project boundaries.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved or affected by the hydroelectric project, such as landowners, local government entities, and environmental groups, this document signals an opportunity to engage with the modification process. Landowners may need to be particularly attentive to understand how their property might be integrated into or excluded from the new project boundary.

Local governments might weigh in on how these changes could support or disrupt community planning and development initiatives. Similarly, environmental advocates may scrutinize the proposed land additions and removals for their potential ecological consequences.

Overall, while this document provides a necessary legal framework for public engagement in the amendment process, its complexity and lack of detailed impact assessment call for further clarification to ensure informed and meaningful participation by all interested parties.

Issues

  • • The document is highly technical and may be difficult for individuals without a legal or energy sector background to understand, especially related to the rules of filing and procedure.

  • • The contact information provided is extensive and detailed, which can be overwhelming for the general public.

  • • The process for submitting comments or interventions is complex and may deter public participation due to its procedural nature.

  • • The language used in the document regarding the amendment of the project boundary and the specifics of land addition and removal is not explained in terms of potential impact on local communities or the environment.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,150
Sentences: 43
Entities: 98

Language

Nouns: 386
Verbs: 86
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 70

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.53
Average Sentence Length:
26.74
Token Entropy:
5.32
Readability (ARI):
21.46

Reading Time

about 4 minutes