FR 2021-03023

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Application for Food and Drug Administration Approval To Market a New Drug

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FDA is asking for people's thoughts on new rules for making and selling new medicines, and they need these thoughts by March 18, 2021. They want to make the process easier and use special forms to help companies apply.

Summary AI

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is seeking public comments on a proposed collection of information as part of its requirement for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This initiative pertains to the application process for FDA approval to market new drugs, covering the submission of data and patent details as specified in FDA regulations. The FDA has developed specific forms to aid applicants and has made updates to the process to improve efficiency. Public comments on these proposals are welcomed by March 18, 2021.

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9510
Document #: 2021-03023
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9510-9512

AnalysisAI

The document is a formal notice from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is currently calling for public comments on a proposed collection of information. This undertaking is required to gain clearance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The primary focus is on the application process for FDA approval to market new drugs, which involves the submission of detailed data and patent information in compliance with existing FDA regulations.

General Summary

This notice is part of a routine process by which the FDA seeks to ensure that new drugs are safe and effective before they are marketed to the public. It outlines the necessary forms and procedures applicants must follow to gain FDA approval. The FDA has made efforts to update and streamline this process to enhance efficiency, which suggests a continued commitment to adapting regulatory processes to modern technological advancements.

Significant Issues and Concerns

  1. Transparency on Fees: The document mentions that "certain fees may be applicable" with the submission of certain forms, but it lacks specifics on these costs. Greater transparency on potential expenses would be beneficial for those who are planning to apply for drug approval.

  2. Details on Operational Efficiencies: Although the document refers to a decrease in the estimated burden due to improved efficiencies, it does not specify what these improvements are. Providing examples would clarify how these efficiencies benefit applicants and the FDA.

  3. Navigating Resources: The document lists multiple URLs for additional guidance and resources. However, having to navigate through various URLs can be cumbersome. A consolidated guide or resource summary would be more user-friendly.

  4. Acronyms and Jargon: The document uses numerous technical acronyms and terms (e.g., NDA, ANDA, DMF) without adequate context or definitions. While these terms may be familiar to some, providing explanations would aid those less familiar with regulatory jargon.

  5. Complex Language: The formal and technical language employed might be challenging for readers without a background in law or regulation. Simplifying the text or providing summaries of key points could enhance accessibility for a broader audience.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document impacts how new pharmaceuticals are introduced to the market. Effective regulation ensures that these drugs are safe for public use, which is of paramount importance for public health. However, the complexity of the application process might discourage smaller entities or less experienced stakeholders from pursuing drug development, potentially limiting innovation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For pharmaceutical companies, particularly those involved in drug development, understanding and complying with these updated regulatory requirements is crucial. This notice represents an opportunity to provide feedback on the process, which could lead to more favorable conditions. Conversely, smaller companies or startups may find the regulatory and financial hurdles particularly challenging, which could impact their market entry feasibility.

In summary, while the document signifies an essential step in ensuring drug safety and efficacy, the process's complexity may hinder accessibility. By addressing identified issues and streamlining access to information, the FDA can foster a more inclusive environment that encourages participation from a diverse range of stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document lists several forms and their uses but doesn't explain if there are any costs associated with submitting these forms beyond 'certain fees may be applicable'. It would be helpful to provide more transparency regarding these potential costs.

  • • The document refers to a decrease in the estimated burden for the information collection but does not explain the specific improved operational efficiencies that led to this adjustment. Providing detailed examples would increase clarity.

  • • Several URLs and websites are listed to provide additional resources and guidance (https://www.fda.gov, etc.), but it might be overwhelming for readers to have to navigate multiple websites to get all the needed information. Consider consolidating or providing a specific guide that directs users through the required resources efficiently.

  • • The document uses numerous acronyms (e.g., OMB, NDA, ANDA, DMF) without always providing context or definitions. While these may be familiar to some readers, clarifying them would aid comprehension for those less acquainted with regulatory terms.

  • • The overall language of the document is formal and contains complex regulatory references, which might be challenging for individuals without a legal or regulatory background to fully understand. Simplification or summarization of key points and steps could enhance accessibility.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 1,251
Sentences: 42
Entities: 95

Language

Nouns: 472
Verbs: 100
Adjectives: 42
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 72

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.36
Average Sentence Length:
29.79
Token Entropy:
5.48
Readability (ARI):
22.26

Reading Time

about 4 minutes