FR 2021-03006

Overview

Title

Notice of Public Meetings of the Tennessee Advisory Committee

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Tennessee Advisory Committee is having an online meeting on February 18, 2021, to talk about civil rights issues in the state, and people can listen and share their thoughts.

Summary AI

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has announced a meeting for the Tennessee Advisory Committee. This meeting will take place online via Webex on February 18, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Central Time, where they will discuss civil rights concerns in Tennessee. The public is welcome to listen in and give comments as time permits. For those who wish to make written comments, they can email the committee by the specified date, and other details can be accessed through the Commission's website.

Abstract

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Tennessee Advisory Committee (Committee) will hold a meeting via the web platform Webex on Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. Central Time. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee to discuss civil rights concerns in the state.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9479
Document #: 2021-03006
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9479-9479

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a meeting by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, specifically the Tennessee Advisory Committee, to discuss civil rights issues in Tennessee. This meeting is set to take place online via Webex on February 18, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Central Time. The notice serves as an invitation for public participation, allowing individuals to listen in and provide comments.

General Summary

This announcement pertains to the upcoming meeting of the Tennessee Advisory Committee on civil rights, which is under the authority of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. The meeting will be held digitally through the Webex platform. Public engagement is a key component, with provisions for both oral and written comments. The meeting’s agenda includes opening remarks, committee discussion, and a public comment segment.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One issue with the document is the lack of detailed information concerning possible costs or any logistical arrangements for the meeting. It is unclear if using Webex incurs any expenses and, if so, whether this choice reflects financial prudence. Furthermore, while instructions for attendance are present, the format could be clearer for easier comprehension. Information regarding the duration of the public comment period during the meeting is not specified, which might lead to confusion for participants wishing to contribute their views.

The document indicates that written comments are welcome for 30 days following the meeting, but it doesn't specify subsequent steps or how these comments are incorporated into the decision-making process. Repetitive references to contact details and websites might create an unnecessarily complex presentation, which could hinder accessibility for some readers.

Public Impact

Broadly, the document signals an opportunity for public involvement in discussing civil rights within Tennessee. It emphasizes transparency by publicizing the meeting and opening a channel for public input. This engagement can contribute to more informed decision-making by integrating diverse opinions and concerns from the community.

However, the absence of detailed structures for public comment can inadvertently limit effective participation. If stakeholders are unclear about how and when they can contribute, this might discourage those wanting to voice their concerns, ultimately reducing public impact.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For civil rights activists and advocacy groups, the notice represents a chance to actively participate in shaping discussions around civil rights issues in Tennessee. Since the meeting is accessible online, it potentially removes geographical barriers, allowing a broader audience to attend and contribute.

Conversely, some stakeholders, particularly those who are not technologically proficient or lack internet access, might find online-only access a barrier. This could limit the diversity of opinions and insights contributed to the discussion, as these groups may be underrepresented.

Overall, while the document sets the foundation for public involvement in civil rights discussions, it would benefit from enhanced clarity and additional information to make participation more inclusive and effective.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details about any associated spending, which makes it difficult to audit for wastefulness or favoritism. It is unclear if there are any costs associated with the meeting.

  • • The use of industry-specific platforms like Webex for the meeting may raise questions regarding why this platform was chosen and if there are any associated costs.

  • • The contact information and instructions for joining the meeting could be more clearly formatted to enhance readability.

  • • Details about how long the public comment period will last are not specified, which may cause confusion.

  • • The text does not specify how long written comments will be accepted after the meeting, apart from stating they should be received within 30 days.

  • • The document repetitively references contact information and websites, which may contribute to an overly complex presentation of information.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 494
Sentences: 22
Entities: 38

Language

Nouns: 170
Verbs: 33
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.01
Average Sentence Length:
22.45
Token Entropy:
4.98
Readability (ARI):
16.71

Reading Time

about a minute or two