FR 2021-02981

Overview

Title

Notice of the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is having a public phone meeting to talk about how to keep important things like supply chains and workers safe and ready. People can listen and share thoughts if they register by email, but only the council members can talk during the meeting.

Summary AI

The Department of Homeland Security is announcing a public meeting for the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) scheduled for March 4, 2021. This meeting, conducted via conference call, will provide updates on issues like supply chain management and workforce talent. To participate or comment, individuals must register by email before specified deadlines. The public will have a chance to comment during a designated period, but participation in deliberations is exclusive to council members.

Abstract

CISA announces a public meeting of the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC). To facilitate public participation, CISA invites public comments on the agenda items and any associated briefing materials to be considered by the council at the meeting.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9529
Document #: 2021-02981
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9529-9530

AnalysisAI

The document from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announces an upcoming public meeting for the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC), scheduled to take place on March 4, 2021. Conducted via conference call, the meeting aims to discuss critical topics such as supply chain management and workforce talent issues. The public is welcome to participate; however, registration is necessary, with deadlines specified for both attending and offering comments.

General Summary

This public notice serves to inform interested individuals and organizations about the NIAC meeting. It outlines important deadlines for registration and provides details on how the meeting will be conducted remotely. Participants are encouraged to engage with the meeting's agenda, specifically during the designated public comment period.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several aspects of the document prompt questions and potential concerns:

  1. Complex Language: The document includes references to specific terms like the "Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)" and executive orders that may be unfamiliar to readers without prior knowledge, which could be a barrier to understanding.

  2. Accessibility: Although email contact is available for assistance, the document lacks detailed measures to accommodate individuals with disabilities, which is a critical oversight in ensuring inclusive participation.

  3. Limited Registration Window: The meeting registration and public comment deadlines are closely tied to the meeting date, potentially limiting broader public involvement, particularly if individuals are unaware of the notice until shortly before these deadlines.

  4. Lack of Alternative Submission Methods: The absence of alternative methods for registration or comment submission, such as postal mail, could hinder participation from individuals without reliable internet access.

  5. Meeting Agenda Details: While the agenda is outlined, it lacks detailed descriptions of what will be covered, particularly in discussions such as the "Supply Chain Panel Discussion" and the "Workforce and Talent Management Study Update." This vagueness may limit the public's ability to fully engage or provide meaningful feedback.

Public Impact

Broadly speaking, this notice provides an opportunity for the public to engage with national discussions affecting critical infrastructure, which is vital given the role such infrastructure plays in daily life. However, the document's complexity and registration barriers might lead to reduced public participation, which could affect representational diversity in the feedback.

Stakeholder Impacts

For specific stakeholders, the meeting offers a platform to influence policies and initiatives related to security and resilience, particularly those working within or alongside infrastructure sectors. Conversely, individuals or groups without internet access or knowledge of technical terms may find themselves excluded from meaningful participation, potentially missing the opportunity to voice concerns or support for proposed changes.

In summary, while the DHS provides an avenue for public involvement in essential national issues, the document's language, registration barriers, and lack of comprehensive accessibility measures might inhibit broad and inclusive participation. Adjustments in these areas could enhance engagement and ensure that diverse voices contribute to critical infrastructure discussions.

Issues

  • • The document description and purpose are clear, but it does not specify any financial aspects or potential expenditures, making it difficult to audit for potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The language used is mostly clear, but some individuals may find terms like 'Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)' or references to executive orders unspecified in the notice difficult to understand without prior knowledge.

  • • While contact information is provided for special assistance, there is no mention of specific measures in place to accommodate individuals with disabilities beyond email contact.

  • • The notice closes the meeting registration on a closely linked date to the meeting, which may limit broader public participation.

  • • There are references to an online portal and email for public comments and registration, but no alternative methods (like postal mail) are mentioned for individuals without internet access.

  • • The agenda of the meeting is listed, but there are no detailed descriptions about what the Supply Chain Panel Discussion or the Workforce and Talent Management Study Update entail, which may limit public understanding and input.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,015
Sentences: 50
Entities: 65

Language

Nouns: 344
Verbs: 94
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 14
Numbers: 49

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.67
Average Sentence Length:
20.30
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
18.93

Reading Time

about 3 minutes