FR 2021-02945

Overview

Title

Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Space Enterprise Consortium

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Space Enterprise Consortium is a group that works on space projects, and they just told the government about new businesses joining and others leaving their group. This means if there are any problems with their work, people can only ask for certain kinds of money in court.

Summary AI

Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC) has filed notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission about new and withdrawn members of its group, under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. Businesses such as 202 Group, LLC and Adaptive Optics Associates, Inc., have joined, while Alliance Technology Group and others have left the venture. These changes limit antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages in specific contexts. The documentation continues a process started in 2018, with planned updates on future membership changes.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9374
Document #: 2021-02945
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9374-9375

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register is a notice related to the Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC), a group operating under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This notice informs the public about the changes in membership of SpEC that were officially registered with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. New members have been added, such as 202 Group, LLC, and Adaptive Optics Associates, Inc., while others, including Alliance Technology Group, have withdrawn from the consortium.

Summary of the Document

The core purpose of the document is to disclose changes in the membership of SpEC, a cooperative venture involved in research and production within the space industry. These changes are significant because they limit the liability of consortium members in terms of antitrust claims, allowing them to focus on collaborative innovation while only requiring payment of actual damages under certain circumstances. This procedural compliance helps ensure transparency and accountability under the Act.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable issue is the complexity of legal references, such as "15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.," which might be unclear to a layperson unfamiliar with how the U.S. Code is formatted and cited. Simplifying or explaining these references within the document could improve understanding for a broader audience. Additionally, detailed lists of companies joining or leaving the consortium may seem verbose and potentially overwhelming for some readers. Summarizing this information might make the document more accessible.

Furthermore, the document is steeped in formal legal language that could pose comprehension challenges to those not versed in legal terminology. Providing additional context or simplifying the language could enhance clarity.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the direct impact of this document may be minimal, as it primarily involves internal administrative changes to a research group. However, the implications of SpEC's work potentially affect the broader industry of space exploration, as consortiums like this one can influence new technological developments and industry standards.

Impact on Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, particularly the added and departing companies, could experience direct impacts. New members joining the consortium stand to benefit from collaborative opportunities, enhanced industry reputation, and legal protections offered under the Act. Conversely, companies leaving the consortium might miss out on these benefits but also gain operational independence from collective activities, which might better align with their strategic objectives.

Overall, documents like this serve to maintain a transparent record of adjustments within influential industry groups, contributing indirectly to the innovation landscape that affects both private and public sector advancements in the space industry.

Issues

  • • The document is primarily a notice and does not detail any specific spending, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending or favoritism toward organizations or individuals.

  • • The legal references such as '15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.' might be unclear to readers not familiar with U.S. Code citations and could be simplified or explained.

  • • The list of companies added or withdrawn from the consortium is long and may be verbose for the reader. Consider presenting this information in a summarized format.

  • • The document uses formal legal terminology which might be difficult for laypersons to understand without additional context or explanation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 674
Sentences: 13
Entities: 151

Language

Nouns: 310
Verbs: 21
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.37
Average Sentence Length:
51.85
Token Entropy:
4.76
Readability (ARI):
28.23

Reading Time

about 3 minutes