Overview
Title
Amendments to Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Large Bank Holding Companies, Intermediate Holding Companies and Savings and Loan Holding Companies
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Reserve made a small fix to how some rules for big banks were written. They made sure everything is numbered and titled the right way, like fixing a mistake in a homework assignment.
Summary AI
The document is a technical correction from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. It fixes errors in the amendatory instruction for Part 217 of the Board's Regulation Q that was published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2021. The corrections involve changes to specific paragraphs and sections within the regulation to ensure proper headings and numbering. The document also informs readers of the effective date of April 5, 2021, for these corrections.
Abstract
This document corrects an error in amendatory instruction 2 affecting Part 217 of the Board's Regulation Q published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2021.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document is a technical correction from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. It addresses errors made in a previous publication concerning Regulation Q, which governs capital planning and stress testing requirements for certain financial institutions. These corrections specify changes to particular sections and numbers within the regulatory text to ensure accuracy. The corrections are scheduled to take effect on April 5, 2021.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The sole focus of this document is to rectify technically specific errors in the instructions related to the regulation. There are no new policies or significant procedural changes introduced; it simply corrects previously made clerical errors. Therefore, there are no significant issues or concerns arising from the content of this document.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this document does not have a direct impact. The technical corrections involve legal and regulatory instructions that are relevant to legal professionals, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies that interact with Regulation Q. Therefore, while the general public may not notice a direct effect, the corrections are an essential component of maintaining coherent regulatory practices that ultimately contribute to the stability of financial systems.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders such as large bank holding companies, intermediate holding companies, and savings and loan holding companies, the document ensures that the regulatory guidance is clear and accurate. This minimizes potential confusion and misinterpretations of financial regulations, reducing compliance risks. Legal professionals engaged in regulatory compliance will find this correction crucial for ensuring proper adherence to the law. Stakeholders reliant on precise regulatory language might view this correction positively as it enhances clarity and operational efficiency.
Overall, while technical in nature, such corrections are vital in maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of financial regulatory frameworks. They support stakeholders in understanding their obligations more clearly and help maintain stable oversight of financial practices.
Issues
• The document primarily focuses on technical corrections to previously published instructions. There are no indications or mentions of spending, wasteful or otherwise, that need to be audited in this particular rule.
• The language used is specific to legal and regulatory amendments. While the language is technical, it is not unusually complex for its target audience, which consists of legal professionals and entities familiar with regulatory documentation.
• The document does not exhibit any apparent bias towards particular organizations or individuals.
• Certain parts of the document might be difficult to understand for someone unfamiliar with legal or financial regulation terminology. While this is typical for such documents, efforts could be made to provide a summary in simpler terms for non-experts.
• The correction details provided are clear and concise for those familiar with the subject matter, but might benefit from additional context for full accessibility to a general audience.