Overview
Title
Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The EPA is sharing a report that shows how the U.S. makes and handles gases that can warm up the earth from 1990 to 2019. They want people to tell them how to make this report better by March 15, 2021, and they plan to use these ideas to finalize the report in April 2021.
Summary AI
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a draft report titled "Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019" for public review. The EPA seeks public comments to improve the quality of this report before it is finalized in April 2021, as well as for future reports. The public is encouraged to submit their comments by March 15, 2021, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or via email. The report outlines U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2019, using methods consistent with international guidelines.
Abstract
The Draft Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019 is available for public review. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requests recommendations for improving the overall quality of the inventory report to be finalized in April 2021, as well as subsequent inventory reports.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a draft report titled "Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019." This document is part of an annual series that records and analyzes greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. The EPA is inviting public feedback for improving this report prior to its finalization in April 2021, with suggestions also considered for future reports.
Summary of the Document
The report presents data on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions over nearly three decades, from 1990 to 2019. The EPA is seeking suggestions to enhance the report's quality, reinforcing its commitment to transparency and accuracy in environmental documentation. Comments from the public are encouraged to be submitted by March 15, 2021, although later submissions will still be considered for future editions. The report follows methodologies recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and adheres to guidelines of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Significant Issues and Concerns
There are several notable issues within the document. Firstly, it does not clearly outline how public comments will be utilized in the final draft, which may cause ambiguity about the role of public input. Secondly, multiple channels for submitting comments are mentioned without indicating any preference, leading to potential confusion for respondents. The document also lacks a definition of what constitutes "Confidential Business Information," possibly deterring some stakeholders from providing input.
Furthermore, the technical jargon, such as references to IPCC methodologies and UNFCCC guidelines, may not be accessible to a general audience. Lastly, the absence of financial details related to the compilation of the report may raise questions about oversight and budgetary implications, though the document itself does not directly address cost issues.
Impact on the Public
This document holds significant potential impact for the general public. It invites participation from citizens, allowing them to contribute to the understanding and management of greenhouse gas emissions at a national level. The report represents an effort to engage the public in environmental stewardship, fostering transparency and mutual responsibility in combating climate change.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The draft report primarily affects environmental groups, policymakers, and industries with high greenhouse gas emissions. By incorporating diverse public feedback, the EPA can create a more comprehensive overview of emissions, aiding policymakers in drafting effective legislation. For industries, the report could influence regulatory development, potentially affecting operational practices to align with climate objectives.
Conversely, some stakeholders may feel their contributions are undervalued if the process for incorporating feedback remains ambiguous. Businesses may also face uncertainties over any regulatory changes stemming from the report, particularly in the absence of clarity on what changes might be expected.
Overall, while the document signifies progress in environmental documentation and public involvement, clearer guidelines and information dissemination could enhance its effectiveness and public trust.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific details on how the feedback from the public will be incorporated into the final report due in April 2021, leading to possible ambiguity about the influence of public comments.
• The document mentions multiple channels for submission of comments, which could lead to confusion without a clear indication of the preferred method or priority of consideration.
• There is a lack of information about what constitutes 'Confidential Business Information,' which may lead to misunderstanding for those wanting to submit comments.
• The notice does not mention any specific financial implications of compiling the inventory report, which could be a concern for auditing purposes even though it doesn't directly address spending issues.
• The document does not specify the extent or depth of the changes that can be suggested or expected for the improvement of the inventory report, possibly leading to unclear expectations from stakeholders.
• Technical terms such as 'Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)' methodologies and 'United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)' guidelines are used without explanation, which might be overly complex for a lay audience.