FR 2021-02868

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Clearing Participant Default Management Procedures

Agencies

ELI5 AI

ICE Clear Credit LLC, a company that helps manage money swaps, is making new rules to handle problems when one of their partners messes up. The changes, approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), include having online meetings when they can't meet in person and making sure important people know what to do during these times.

Summary AI

The document discusses the approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of proposed changes by ICE Clear Credit LLC (ICC) to its Clearing Participant Default Management Procedures. The changes aim to enhance the management of risks during a participant's default. They include provisions for convening remote meetings of the CDS Default Committee via teleconference if in-person meetings are not possible, updating default notification procedures to involve regulators, and clarifying the roles and responsibilities of key officers like the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and Chief Compliance Officer (CCO). These updates are intended to improve the clarity, efficiency, and resilience of ICC's processes in handling defaults.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9404
Document #: 2021-02868
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9404-9406

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register details the approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of a rule change proposed by ICE Clear Credit LLC (ICC) regarding its procedures for managing defaults by clearing participants. This rule change is important in the context of ensuring financial stability and efficient markets, as it is geared toward enhancing how ICC handles situations when a participant fails to meet its obligations.

General Summary

The key components of this proposal focus on updating the ways the Credit Default Swap (CDS) Default Committee can meet in times of participant default. Specifically, the ICC seeks to enable remote meetings through teleconferencing when in-person meetings are impractical. This flexibility aims to minimize disruptions and ensure timely and efficient responses during default events. Additionally, the rule changes aim to clarify the roles of key officers, such as the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), especially concerning default notifications to regulators and internal stakeholders.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A few concerns arise upon reviewing the document:

  1. Terminology and Acronyms: The text uses specific financial terminology and acronyms like 'CDS' (Credit Default Swap) and 'CP' (Clearing Participant) without definitions or explanations, potentially confusing some readers who are not well-versed in financial jargon.

  2. Date Discrepancy: There is a date discrepancy in the text regarding the publication of the proposed rule change. It mentions a publication date of January 8, 2020, which seems to be an error, as it likely should be 2021.

  3. Complexity of Language: The document contains dense regulatory language that might be challenging for readers unfamiliar with securities law, potentially limiting its accessibility.

  4. Lack of Public Engagement Detail: There is no mention of public comments or stakeholder consultations, raising questions about the inclusivity and transparency of the rule-change process.

Potential Public Impact

The approval of this rule change is primarily concerned with the stability of financial markets and could indirectly affect the broader public by aiming to prevent broader financial disruptions triggered by defaulting clearing participants. Enhancing the efficiency and clarity of default management procedures could contribute to overall economic stability by reducing the risk of cascading defaults in the financial system.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For ICC, these changes are significant as they aim to improve the organization's ability to manage risks associated with participant defaults. The flexibility to convene the CDS Default Committee remotely ensures that ICC can respond swiftly to defaults, regardless of external constraints such as geographical barriers or unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters.

For regulators and other stakeholders, such as financial institutions participating in CDS markets, the changes promise increased clarity and efficiency in default management procedures. This could lead to more consistent and predictable responses to defaults, potentially lowering systemic risk in financial markets.

In summary, while the proposed rule changes appear to enhance the ability of ICE Clear Credit LLC to manage participant defaults effectively, they also highlight areas for improved communication and public engagement. Ensuring that stakeholders and the general public are informed and engaged in such processes is crucial for maintaining trust and transparency in financial regulatory practices.

Issues

  • • The document does not clearly define certain terms or acronyms, such as 'CDS' and 'CP', which might not be familiar to all readers.

  • • There is a discrepancy in the dates mentioned regarding the publication of the proposed rule change, where the text states it was published on January 8, 2020, but it seems to be a typo as the correct year should be 2021.

  • • The document contains dense legal and regulatory jargon that could be difficult to understand for readers who are not familiar with securities law or financial regulations.

  • • The document does not provide an abstract or a summary, which might help readers quickly grasp the main points of the rule change.

  • • There is no discussion on how the changes might impact efficiency, competition, or capital formation beyond a generic statement, which may not provide sufficient insight for stakeholders.

  • • The document lacks any mention of public comments or stakeholder consultations, potentially raising concerns about the inclusivity and transparency of the decision-making process.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,624
Sentences: 82
Entities: 197

Language

Nouns: 866
Verbs: 254
Adjectives: 107
Adverbs: 66
Numbers: 105

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.38
Average Sentence Length:
32.00
Token Entropy:
5.31
Readability (ARI):
23.64

Reading Time

about 10 minutes