FR 2021-02857

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend the Fee Schedule

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. changed some rules about how they charge people for trading, aiming to make trading better and cheaper by giving deals to those who trade more, so everyone can get better prices and have more fun trading.

Summary AI

Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. proposed a rule change to modify its fee schedule related to its equities trading platform. The changes focus on updating the Add/Remove Volume Tiers and introducing a new Non-Displayed Step-Up Tier to provide enhanced rebates to members based on certain trading volume criteria. These changes are intended to encourage more order flow to the exchange, improve market liquidity, and provide better pricing options for participants. The proposed amendments aim to foster a more competitive trading environment, benefiting all market participants.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 9406
Document #: 2021-02857
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 9406-9410

AnalysisAI

Editorial Commentary

General Summary

The document from the Federal Register discusses a proposed rule change submitted by Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. It focuses on revisions to their fee schedule related to equities trading. Mainly, the proposal seeks to amend the Add/Remove Volume Tiers and introduce a new Non-Displayed Step-Up Tier to offer enhanced financial incentives for members based on their trading volume. These adjustments aim to stimulate increased trading activity on the exchange, enhance market liquidity, and provide better price points for traders.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A primary concern with the document is its reliance on technical jargon and terminology specific to financial markets and trading. This reliance makes it challenging for readers without a comprehensive background in finance to understand. Additionally, while the document outlines changes in the fee schedule, it lacks specific data on how these adjustments will affect market participants or overall liquidity. The potential implications for smaller market participants, who may not have the capacity to meet the higher trading volumes required to benefit from these incentives, are not discussed in detail. Furthermore, absent is an analysis of any potential negative impacts, particularly how these financial incentives might influence trading behavior or lead to unforeseen market dynamics.

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, the proposed changes might seem irrelevant at first glance. However, they can influence market liquidity and efficiency, which are essential for a robust financial ecosystem. Enhanced liquidity often leads to better pricing and can reduce the cost of trading for all market participants. By encouraging more order flow, the exchange aims to maintain a competitive position among its peers, which might indirectly benefit individual investors due to improved trading conditions and price stability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Market Participants: Traders and firms actively using Cboe EDGX may benefit from the new incentives if they can meet the increased volume thresholds. They might receive higher rebates, lowering their trading costs. However, firms that cannot meet these new requirements might not benefit from the changes, potentially increasing the competitive gap between large and small traders.

Cboe EDGX Exchange: The proposed changes aim to attract more trading volume, enhancing the exchange's competitiveness. Successful implementation can strengthen its market presence and appeal to high-volume traders.

Regulators and Analysts: These changes highlight trends in how exchanges leverage financial incentives to drive their growth strategies. They serve as a reference for understanding how regulatory frameworks adapt to market demands, influencing future policy decisions.

In conclusion, while the document outlines strategies to enhance market competitiveness and liquidity, it also raises important questions regarding accessibility and impacts on various market stakeholders. A clearer explanation of the terms and a more comprehensive discussion on the effects across different market layers could help in better understanding these proposed changes.

Financial Assessment

The document in question outlines a proposal by the Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. to amend its fee schedule concerning its equities trading platform. The focus is on rebates and fees associated with adding or removing liquidity, which are critical elements in facilitating trading activity on the exchange.

Summary of Financial References

The document highlights several financial allocations in the form of rebates and fees designed to incentivize or discourage particular trading behaviors. Currently, the exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.0016 per share for orders priced at or above $1.00 that add liquidity. It charges a fee of $0.0027 per share for orders that remove liquidity. For orders priced below $1.00, the exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00009 per share and levies a fee amounting to 0.30% of the Dollar Value for liquidity removal.

A distinct feature of the changes is seen in the proposed modification of "Growth Tier 2," where the enhanced rebate is set to increase from $0.0027 to $0.0030 per share. Moreover, a new Non-Displayed Step-Up Tier is proposed, maintaining an enhanced rebate of $0.0025 per share under certain conditions.

Relation to Identified Issues

The reference to rebates and fees is directly tied to the broader industry context where exchanges like EDGX operate in an intensely competitive environment. Exchanges implement such financial mechanisms to attract more trading volume by providing financial incentives for liquidity-adding behaviors. However, the document's complexity poses a challenge for readers unfamiliar with financial jargon or the mechanics of securities exchanges.

The document's focus on rebates and fees does not provide specific data on how these changes will impact market participants. For smaller market participants, who may not be as agile as larger entities in meeting the criteria for these tiers, there might be a disproportionate impact. Although the document discusses enhancements to rebates, it does not consider potential adverse effects these financial changes might have on market dynamics or behaviors, for instance, causing increased competition that may edge smaller players out.

Additionally, the discussion of these financial figures relies on an understanding of footnoted terms such as "ADV" (Average Daily Volume) and "TCV" (Total Consolidated Volume), which are not thoroughly explained. This reliance limits the document's accessibility to a wider audience lacking detailed financial acumen or context.

Overall, while the financial references in terms of rebates and fees are clear, the implications for various types of market participants and the broader market dynamics are less transparent. Addressing these issues would enhance understanding and provide a more comprehensive view of the financial strategies within the exchange.

Issues

  • • The document contains jargon and technical language related to financial markets and trading, which might be difficult for a layperson to understand.

  • • There is a lack of specific numerical data on how the proposed changes might affect market participants or overall market liquidity.

  • • The potential effects of the rule changes on smaller market participants are not discussed in detail.

  • • The document does not discuss any potential negative impacts of the fee changes or provided rebates on market dynamics or trader behavior.

  • • There is no clear explanation of what the footnoted terms signify and how they relate to the broader financial market context.

  • • The document assumes significant prior knowledge regarding the structure and function of securities exchanges, which may not be accessible to all readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 5
Words: 5,140
Sentences: 172
Entities: 392

Language

Nouns: 1,539
Verbs: 579
Adjectives: 333
Adverbs: 161
Numbers: 193

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.11
Average Sentence Length:
29.88
Token Entropy:
5.67
Readability (ARI):
21.35

Reading Time

about 19 minutes