FR 2021-02758

Overview

Title

Air Plan Approval; Texas; Clean Air Act Requirements for Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance and Nonattainment New Source Review

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA wants to make sure the air is clean in two big cities in Texas by checking cars more and keeping a close eye on new pollution. They're letting people share their thoughts about this plan until the end of March 2021.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve two updates to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) from Texas. These updates detail how the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria areas meet the Clean Air Act requirements for enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance, as well as rules for controlling new sources of air pollution. Texas has shown that the measures already in place comply with federal guidelines for areas struggling with serious ozone pollution. The public can submit comments on this proposal until March 31, 2021.

Abstract

Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve portions of two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Texas for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The SIP revisions proposed for approval describe how CAA requirements for vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) are met in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) serious ozone nonattainment areas.

Citation: 86 FR 11913
Document #: 2021-02758
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11913-11915

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document details a proposal by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to approve two revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by Texas. These revisions focus on air quality standards related to ozone pollution in two major metropolitan areas: Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria. Specifically, the proposal addresses the requirements for enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance as well as the regulations for new sources of air pollution, illustrating how Texas has complied with federal standards.

General Summary

This document outlines a proposed rule by the EPA which seeks to approve Texas's revisions to its air quality plan. The revisions demonstrate compliance with federal requirements under the Clean Air Act for combating ozone pollution in two "serious" nonattainment areas—regions that exceed federally mandated air quality levels. The aim is to ensure that these areas have effective systems in place to control vehicle emissions and regulate new or modified industrial sources of air pollution. The public is invited to comment on this proposal until March 31, 2021.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document is dense with technical jargon and legal references, such as specific sections of the Texas Administrative Code and references to past Federal Register citations. The average reader might find these references challenging to understand without additional context or explanation. The document also discusses the reclassification of nonattainment areas and legal decisions, which might be difficult for those without a legal background to fully grasp, especially given the use of older population data from the 1990 Census.

Moreover, the various methods for submitting comments, alongside the confidentiality warnings and rules for multimedia submissions, might confuse someone unfamiliar with regulatory processes. The use of specific legal terminologies and technical standards may alienate laypersons who are not versed in environmental regulations.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the proposal affects public health by aiming to improve air quality standards in two large metropolitan areas known for elevated levels of ozone pollution. By ensuring compliance with federal standards, the proposal seeks to reduce pollutants that contribute to smog, therefore protecting residents' health and contributing to a better environment.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For residents of Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, the adoption of these revisions should lead to cleaner air and potentially fewer health problems related to ozone pollution, such as asthma or other respiratory issues. Vehicle owners in these areas might experience stricter inspection and maintenance requirements to conform to the enhanced vehicle inspection standards, which could lead to inconveniences or costs related to vehicle compliance.

For industrial stakeholders, particularly those involved in new or expanded industrial projects, the proposal introduces a regulatory framework with stricter emissions control measures. Compliance could mean potential operational adjustments or financial investments to meet these updated standards. However, it also provides clarity and a pathway forward in terms of adherence to federal and state regulations.

Overall, while the proposal outlines measures to protect and improve public health and the environment, the complexity of the document may require more accessible communication and dialogue between the EPA, the state of Texas, and the public to ensure widespread understanding and compliance.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical terms and references to specific regulations (e.g., '40 CFR 51.350'), which may be difficult for a layperson to understand without further explanation or definitions.

  • • The explanation of nonattainment reclassification and deadlines (e.g., the discussion of court decisions and area classifications) is complex and might be difficult for readers to follow without legal expertise.

  • • The references to specific Texas Administrative Code sections and Federal Register citations might be difficult for non-experts to cross-reference due to lack of direct links or simplified summaries.

  • • The document includes detailed population statistics from the 1990 Census without explaining the relevance of using such old data, which could confuse readers about its applicability to current circumstances.

  • • The discussion of multisubmission methods for comments can be seen as a bit complex, especially regarding confidentiality warnings and multimedia submission rules, potentially confusing those unfamiliar with legal processes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 3,387
Sentences: 103
Entities: 380

Language

Nouns: 1,086
Verbs: 230
Adjectives: 203
Adverbs: 51
Numbers: 267

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.90
Average Sentence Length:
32.88
Token Entropy:
5.72
Readability (ARI):
21.71

Reading Time

about 13 minutes