FR 2021-02647

The Federal Register notice from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) involves a request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for public feedback on the information collection related to the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). This system is utilized to gather details about nonimmigrant students and their affiliated schools in the United States, specifically through the formal documents known as forms I-17 and I-20. A key element in the proposed change is the introduction of a new data field—the city of birth. This addition is intended to help differentiate between applicants with similar names and birth countries. Public input is invited until April 12, 2021, facilitated by online submissions on the regulations.gov platform.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One primary concern is the introduction of an additional data field for the city of birth in the SEVIS. While the intention is presumably to enhance applicant identification, the document fails to transparently address how this data could affect individuals' privacy and whether it poses any significant risks. Moreover, the estimated public burden of 1,019,757 annual hours associated with information collection is substantial. However, the documentation does little to detail the methodology behind this calculation, leaving stakeholders in the dark about the basis for these projections.

Despite a stated aim of minimizing the burden associated with the collection of information, the document provides limited clarity on what tangible steps will be undertaken. For instance, it does not highlight specific technological solutions or innovations that could ease the process. Furthermore, while the document invites public comments, it lacks detailed discussions on cost management or potential wasteful spending that may arise from this procedural expansion.

Impact on the Public

The changes proposed in the SEVIS information collection can potentially affect a wide array of stakeholders—from educational institutions to students seeking to study in the United States. The document's stated approach can have substantial implications for non-profit institutions and individual respondents who regularly interact with the SEVIS system. With more than 47,000 respondents, ensuring clarity and accessibility in communication is paramount. However, the use of technical jargon, such as "nonimmigrant students," with minimal explanation, could hinder understanding among general readers.

Effects on Specific Stakeholders

Educational entities and students bear the brunt of these changes, given their direct involvement with SEVIS. The addition of the city of birth as a data requirement aims to streamline applicant differentiation, potentially simplifying the process for administrative bodies. However, schools and students might see this as an added layer in application procedures, necessitating further operational adjustments. Conversely, individuals and organizations with robust data-sharing infrastructures may experience fewer disruptions, highlighting a disparity in the readiness and responsiveness among stakeholders.

In conclusion, while the DHS seeks to enhance its information collection efficiency through SEVIS, the process raises questions about privacy, public burden estimates, and stakeholder readiness. The public must engage diligently, providing feedback that ensures these concerns are addressed thoughtfully and transparently.