FR 2021-02630

Overview

Title

Proposed Reissuance of NPDES General Permit for Tribal Enhancement and Federal Research Marine Net Pen Facilities Within Puget Sound (WAG132000)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA wants to make new rules for special fish farms in Puget Sound where they can grow a lot of fish each year. They are asking people what they think about this plan until March 26, 2021.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 is proposing to reissue a general permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for specific marine net pen facilities in Puget Sound. This draft permit would apply to tribal enhancement net pens, which can raise up to 200,000 pounds of native salmonids annually, and federal research net pen facilities, which can raise up to 100,000 pounds of native finfish each year. Facilities currently eligible for the permit coverage must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) within 90 days of the permit's effective date, while new facilities starting operations afterward must submit their NOI at least 180 days before they start operating. The EPA is currently accepting public comments on this proposal until March 26, 2021.

Abstract

The Director of the Water Division, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10, proposes to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Tribal Enhancement and Federal Research Marine Net Pen Facilities Within Puget Sound (draft general permit). As proposed, eligible facilities include tribal enhancement net pens, which are permitted to raise up to 200,000 pounds of native salmonids over a four month growing period each year, and federal research net pen facilities, which are permitted to raise up to 100,000 pounds annually of native finfish. Currently, there are five tribal enhancement facilities and one federal research facility eligible for coverage under the general permit. Existing enhancement and research facilities may request authorization to discharge under the general permit by submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) no more than ninety (90) days following the effective date of the permit. New enhancement or research facilities that begin operations after the effective date of the general permit must submit a NOI at least 180 days prior to initiation of operations. Upon receipt, EPA will review the NOI to ensure that all permit requirements are met. If determined appropriate by EPA, a discharger will be granted coverage under the general permit upon the date that EPA provides written notification. EPA is accepting public comments on the draft general permit.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8779
Document #: 2021-02630
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8779-8779

AnalysisAI

The document from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 proposes the reissuance of a general permit related to marine net pen facilities in Puget Sound. The permit falls under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and is specifically targeted to tribal enhancement net pens and federal research net pen facilities. Facilities under this permit are allowed to raise substantial numbers of native fish each year, with tribal pens able to hold up to 200,000 pounds of native salmonids annually, and research facilities holding up to 100,000 pounds of native finfish.

General Summary

The main purpose of this document is to lay out the proposal for permitting these operations and to invite public opinion. Currently, five tribal enhancement facilities and one federal research facility qualify to apply for this permit. The document outlines the requirements for existing and future facilities to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) if they seek authorization to operate under this permit. Public comments are being solicited until March 26, 2021, providing an opportunity for stakeholders and the general public to weigh in on the proposal and influence its final form.

Key Issues and Concerns

Several significant issues arise from this document. The environmental implications of allowing such high volumes of fish farming in Puget Sound are substantial but remain insufficiently detailed in terms of potential impact on local ecosystems. Raising large amounts of native salmonids and finfish could affect ecological balance and water quality, potentially introducing pollutants or altering marine conditions.

Another concern revolves around the ambiguity in the review process for approving Notice of Intent submissions—details about how the EPA will evaluate these and decide on granting permits are not fully explained. Additionally, the rationale for setting the particular limits on fish amounts is not shared, leaving stakeholders possibly unaware of the underlying reasoning and whether other options were considered.

Moreover, while the document briefly mentions compliance with important regulations such as the Endangered Species Act, it lacks specifics on how these requirements will be enforced or monitored through the proposed permit.

Broad Public Impact

The issuance of this permit could have a variety of effects on the public. On a positive note, it could support research initiatives and tribal enhancement projects, potentially benefiting the local economy and cultural practices of indigenous communities in the region. Fishery enhancements could also contribute to conservation efforts by supporting the stocks of native species.

On the flip side, environmentalists and local stakeholders might worry about the impact on Puget Sound's delicate ecosystems. Questions about pollution, habitat disruption, and long-term ecological effects remain unanswered, stirring apprehension within communities and environmental advocacy groups.

Stakeholders' Perspectives

For tribes and research entities, the permit represents an opportunity to expand and legally secure their operations, potentially leading to economic and scientific progress. However, these stakeholders may need more clarity on how the permit will be implemented to plan their activities effectively.

Conversely, local residents and environmental bodies may see this as a precursor to broader ecological issues. Without clear guidelines on ecological protection, these groups may lobby against the permit or call for stricter conditions and more comprehensive impact assessments.

In conclusion, while the reissuance of this general permit by the EPA has the potential to foster beneficial development and research, it also demands careful consideration of its potential environmental impacts and clearer communication regarding its execution to satisfy and inform all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information about the potential environmental impact of raising up to 200,000 pounds of native salmonids and 100,000 pounds of native finfish, which could raise concerns about ecological balance and water quality in Puget Sound.

  • • The process and criteria for EPA's review of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submissions are not clearly described, leaving ambiguity about how decisions are made to grant coverage under the general permit.

  • • There is no discussion of alternative options or the reasoning for the specific limits proposed for salmonids and finfish, which might help stakeholders better understand the decision-making process.

  • • The document refers to compliance with the Endangered Species Act and other regulatory requirements but does not detail how these are addressed or ensured under the proposed permit.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 506
Sentences: 20
Entities: 40

Language

Nouns: 175
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 33
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.26
Average Sentence Length:
25.30
Token Entropy:
5.01
Readability (ARI):
19.49

Reading Time

about a minute or two