FR 2021-02625

Overview

Title

Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Schedule for the Preparation of an Environmental Assessment for the Linam Ranch Project

Agencies

ELI5 AI

A company wants to stop using a gas pipeline in New Mexico because it's too expensive to keep fixing, and there isn't enough money to pay for it. A group called the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is checking to make sure this won't be a problem and will tell people what they find out by March 19, 2021.

Summary AI

Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC has filed an application to abandon certain natural gas pipeline facilities in Lea County, New Mexico, because the maintenance costs are too high and not covered by current revenue. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission plans to issue an Environmental Assessment (EA) for this project by March 19, 2021, with a 90-day deadline for federal authorization decisions set for June 17, 2021. The public and other stakeholders can receive updates on the project's progress through a free online subscription service provided by the Commission.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8774
Document #: 2021-02625
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8774-8774

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which outlines the schedule for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Linam Ranch Project proposed by Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC. The project seeks authorization to abandon certain natural gas pipeline facilities in Lea County, New Mexico, due to untenable maintenance costs that are not supported by existing revenues.

General Overview

Transwestern Pipeline Company's application is a request to discontinue use and effectively dismantle parts of their infrastructure in Lea County. Given the apparent lack of firm transportation agreements, it appears these facilities are not being actively utilized, raising questions about their financial viability. The document provides the timeline within which the Environmental Assessment will be completed and when the federal authorization decision will be made.

Significant Issues

One primary issue the document raises is the lack of detailed financial data to justify why the maintenance costs are deemed excessive. This information is crucial for stakeholders to understand and evaluate the company's decision to abandon these facilities.

The document also provides sparse detail regarding the potential impact on the local community, aside from mentioning the absence of firm transportation agreements. It leaves the reader wondering about the broader social and economic impacts of this abandonment on the local community and other stakeholders.

Additionally, while the procedural timeline for the environmental review is clearly stated, the lack of communication regarding what would trigger a schedule change might be unsettling for some stakeholders. This uncertainty can hinder constructive planning by all parties involved.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document signifies a step in regulatory processes that might not immediately affect their daily lives unless they reside or have interests in Lea County. It sets a precedent for how energy infrastructure decisions are handled, reflecting the prioritization of economic viability in the energy sector.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders such as local governments, environmental groups, and potentially affected landowners may find both challenges and opportunities in this notice. The abandonment could offer environmental benefits if the facilities are currently underutilized and pose environmental risks. However, without detailed impact assessments, there is uncertainty regarding ecosystem disturbance or potential land repurposing opportunities.

The notice's provision regarding public notifications and access to updates through various FERC services might seem overwhelming. For stakeholders unfamiliar with these systems, navigating the information may pose a challenge. Clearer guidelines or simplifications in the communication channels could make the process more approachable and accessible.

In summary, while the document effectively communicates the procedural components of the regulatory process, additional information regarding both the economic reasoning and community impact would provide a clearer picture of the project's implications. This would foster greater transparency and facilitate a more informed discourse among stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed justification for why the maintenance expenses are considered excessive and why they cannot be recovered by the current revenue stream.

  • • The document lacks detail regarding the impact of the abandonment on local communities and stakeholders beyond the statement that there are no firm transportation agreements.

  • • The procedural timeline for the issuance of the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the federal authorization decision is provided, but it lacks contingency plans or thresholds for what constitutes a 'necessary schedule change'.

  • • The document references multiple methods for obtaining additional information (eSubscription service, Commission's Office of External Affairs, FERC website), which may overwhelm or confuse someone not familiar with navigating these services.

  • • There is an assumption that the reader is familiar with Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act, which might not be clear to all readers without further explanation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 696
Sentences: 24
Entities: 72

Language

Nouns: 229
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.02
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
5.18
Readability (ARI):
20.21

Reading Time

about 2 minutes