Overview
Title
Streptomycin; Pesticide Tolerances
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The EPA has set rules on how much of a special bug-fighting substance, called streptomycin, can safely be on oranges and their dried peels. This helps make sure that when people eat these fruits, they're safe and won't harm them.
Summary AI
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established tolerances for the pesticide streptomycin on specific citrus fruits and their dried pulp. These new limits are set for residues of the fungicide in the citrus group 10-10 at 0.8 ppm and in dried pulp at 3 ppm, based on a petition by Geo Logic Corporation. The EPA has reviewed data and determined that the new tolerances are safe for consumption by the general population, including infants and children, with no expected harmful effects. Additionally, the tolerances for some other commodities related to streptomycin have been updated or removed, reflecting changes due to expired protections or data updates.
Abstract
This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of streptomycin in or on the fruit, citrus, group 10-10 and fruit, citrus, group 10-10, dried pulp. Geo Logic Corporation requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Regulation
In a recent regulation, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets new tolerance levels for the presence of the pesticide streptomycin on citrus fruits and their dried pulp. These levels are set at 0.8 parts per million (ppm) for citrus fruits and 3 ppm for their dried pulp. The adjustments come in response to a petition by Geo Logic Corporation. The EPA has conducted reviews to ensure the safety of these tolerances, declaring them safe for consumption by all people, including infants and children.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues accompany this regulation:
Lack of Justification for Changes: The document does not clearly explain why the original tolerance levels proposed by the petitioner were modified. The reasons behind the EPA's decision to set different levels remain unstated, leaving the changes open to questions.
Complex Language and Jargon: The document employs highly technical language and intricate chemical names, which could confuse readers without a scientific background. This can make it challenging for general audiences to fully grasp the regulation's specifics.
Complicated Procedures for Objections: Instructions on how to file objections or request hearings are complex. The detailed procedural language may overwhelm individuals or entities unfamiliar with legal processes, potentially discouraging participation.
International Standards: The document mentions that the Codex Alimentarius, a body that sets international food standards, has not established any maximum residue limits (MRLs) for streptomycin. This could suggest a lack of international alignment, potentially leading to trade issues or discrepancies in food safety standards between countries.
Withdrawal of the IR-4 Petition: Another petition related to streptomycin was withdrawn, but the document does not provide reasons for this withdrawal. Understanding these reasons could provide more context to the current regulatory action.
Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Impact on the Public:
For the general public, this regulation ensures a level of safety regarding pesticide residues on food. By reviewing scientific data, the EPA aims to prevent harmful health effects from the consumption of citrus products treated with streptomycin. This assurance can contribute to consumer confidence in food safety.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
Agricultural Producers and Pesticide Manufacturers: Growers and manufacturers will need to adhere to the new tolerance levels, which might require adjustments in pesticide application practices to ensure compliance. This might involve financial implications for monitoring and testing but offers clear regulatory guidelines for streptomycin use.
Food Manufacturers and Retailers: These stakeholders must ensure their products meet the updated safety standards. While this maintains consumer trust, it could increase operational costs related to compliance verification.
Farmers and Rural Communities: These communities might experience both positive and negative effects. On one hand, these regulations may encourage the use of safer agricultural practices. On the other hand, they might face economic impacts if their produce does not meet the set standards or if compliance costs rise.
Overall, the EPA aims to balance consumer safety with practical standards for agricultural and food industries. While the precise impact will vary, ensuring compliance with these new tolerances is essential for maintaining both public health and industry stability.
Issues
• The regulation does not clearly justify why the petitioner-proposed tolerance levels for citrus fruit and dried pulp were not accepted, and why different levels were established.
• The document uses technical jargon and complex chemical names (such as 'O-2-Deoxy-2-(methylamino)-a-Lglucopyranosyl-(1-2)-O-5-deoxy-3-Cformyl-a-L-lyxofuranosyl-(1-4)-N,N′-bis(aminoiminomethyl)-D-streptamine') that may be difficult for general readers to understand.
• Instructions for filing an objection or hearing request are complex and may be difficult for non-experts to comprehend.
• The document mentions that the Codex has not established any MRLs for streptomycin, but it does not clarify the implications of this lack of international harmonization of standards.
• There is no explanation for the withdrawal of the IR-4 petition, which might be relevant for understanding the full context of the regulation changes.