FR 2021-02472

The recent notice from the United States Mint, part of the Treasury Department, published in the Federal Register, informs the public about the pricing for two coin programs: the 2021 National Law Enforcement Memorial and Museum Commemorative Coin Program, and the Christa McAuliffe Silver Dollar. While the core intention of the document is clear, it falls short in a few areas that might be critical for the audience who are potential coin collectors or members of the general public interested in commemorative items.

General Summary

The notice primarily announces that the pricing for these commemorative coins, including those with gold, will adhere to the standards set in a pricing grid available on the Mint's official website. It cites authority from two pieces of legislation: Public Law 116-94 and Public Law 116-65. Additionally, it provides contact information for further inquiries, listing two program managers, Rosa Matos and Rosa Williams.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document has several notable issues. Firstly, it does not specify the prices of the commemorative coins directly, instead redirecting to the Mint's website. This could be problematic for individuals lacking internet access, making it inconvenient to ascertain the prices.

Secondly, it omits details about the coins themselves, such as their design, composition, or size, leaving potential buyers without much-needed information to make informed decisions.

Moreover, while it offers contact information for two managers, it does not clarify if they have distinct roles or what sorts of inquiries each manages best, which may lead to confusion.

The document also references legal authorities, Public Law 116-94 and Public Law 116-65, but does not describe these laws' relevance. Such omissions could leave readers unclear about the regulatory framework supporting the coin programs.

Lastly, the billing code "P" mentioned lacks an explanation, which may be ambiguous for readers unfamiliar with such codes.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the notice’s impact on the general public might be limited owing to its lack of specific details that would typically guide a purchasing decision. Individuals interested in these commemorative coins are likely seeking a combination of historic value, investment potential, and aesthetic appeal. However, without detailed information, their ability to assess these aspects is hindered.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders, such as coin collectors or historians, this document might negatively impact their ability to plan purchases or understand the significance of these coins without additional legwork. Collectors may be particularly inconvenienced by the lack of direct pricing information, as well as the absence of details regarding the coin's features.

On a positive note, if the coins are well-received, they might serve to honor and promote awareness of the specific causes they commemorate—the law enforcement community and the legacy of Christa McAuliffe, respectively. However, for patriotic societies or education-focused stakeholders interested in Christa McAuliffe's legacy or the National Law Enforcement Memorial, there might be some disappointment due to the sparse information provided.

In conclusion, while the document fulfills a basic notice function, it could be improved by including detailed and clear information directly within the text to better serve its intended audience.

The document from the United States Mint, related to the pricing of the 2021 National Law Enforcement Memorial and Museum Commemorative Coin Program and Christa McAuliffe Silver Dollar, presents some notable aspects regarding financial information and its delivery to the public.

Financial References and Issues

The primary financial reference in this document pertains to the pricing of commemorative coins. The document states that "products containing gold coins will be priced according to the Pricing of Numismatic and Commemorative Gold and Platinum Products Grid" posted on the Mint's website. This reference is somewhat indirect, as it does not include specific prices within the notice itself but instead guides the reader to an online resource.

This lack of direct pricing information can be problematic for a few reasons. Firstly, it poses an inconvenience for individuals who do not have easy access to the internet. This reliance on an external website for key financial details hinders full transparency, as it assumes that all interested parties can readily access and navigate the online grid.

Context and Accessibility

While the document provides contact information for obtaining further details, the absence of explicit pricing directly in the document diminishes the accessibility of financial information. Often, readers of such notices may include collectors or interested parties excluding professionals. These individuals might prefer immediate access to detailed pricing without needing additional steps to seek out this information.

Additionally, the document's reference to the Public Law 116-94 and Public Law 116-65 offers no informative context regarding their financial implications. Without detailing how these laws specifically tie into the coin program's economics, readers may not grasp the legal mandates or fiscal allocations that govern this pricing structure.

Clarification Needs

To address these issues, a more inclusive approach would involve providing a summary or examples of price ranges directly within the document text. Moreover, explaining the relevance of the cited public laws concerning these programs' funding or pricing framework would enhance understanding and connect the legal context with the notice.

Overall, more comprehensive financial communication within the document itself, rather than deferring to an external source, would better serve to inform all stakeholders and uphold transparency in governmental financial reporting.