FR 2021-02424

Overview

Title

Pacific Island Fisheries; Experimental Fishing Permit

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service gave permission to the Hawaii Longline Association to test some new bird-scaring strings while fishing, to see if they can help keep birds safe without needing other special tricks. The test runs for a year and aims to figure out how these strings might affect seabirds.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is granting an experimental fishing permit to the Hawaii Longline Association (HLA). This permit allows them to use tori lines, which are bird scaring devices, in their deep-set longline fishing operations in Hawaii to see if these can help with conservation and management without using other bird-deterrent methods usually required. The permit is valid from January 27, 2021, to January 26, 2022, unless changed or canceled sooner. This experiment is part of a broader effort to understand better how these particular fishing practices affect seabirds.

Abstract

NMFS is issuing an experimental fishing permit (EFP) to the Hawaii Longline Association (HLA) to test the conservation and management usefulness of tori lines (bird scaring streamers) in the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8341
Document #: 2021-02424
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8341-8342

AnalysisAI

The document pertains to the issuance of an experimental fishing permit (EFP) by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This permit is granted to the Hawaii Longline Association (HLA) to explore the use of bird-scaring devices known as tori lines within the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery. The experiment aims to assess the conservation benefits and management effectiveness of these devices, which could potentially reduce the need for other bird-deterrent strategies.

General Summary

The permit allows the HLA to test the tori lines north of 23° N, which is significant because this area has particular regulations designed to protect seabirds. Traditionally, vessels fishing in this region must use specific methods such as strategic offal discharge and blue-dyed bait to avoid harming seabirds. However, during this experiment, these requirements are waived to test the efficacy of the tori lines. The permit is effective for a year, beginning January 27, 2021, and ending January 26, 2022, and may be altered or terminated if needed.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the absence of information regarding the costs associated with implementing this experimental permit and the funding sources for the project. Knowing these details would offer a clearer understanding of the potential economic impact. Additionally, the document does not elaborate on how the success or failure of the tori lines will be measured. It would be beneficial to outline specific criteria or metrics that will be used to evaluate the experiment's outcomes.

The document also omits an explanation for the exemption from standard bird-protection requirements, or an analysis of its reasoning. Clarifying this would enhance understanding, particularly for stakeholders concerned with seabird conservation. Moreover, the potential environmental impacts—positive or negative—of the tori lines are not discussed, nor are any risks associated with their use. Such information would be invaluable for assessing the broader implications of this experimental approach.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly speaking, this document reflects efforts to innovate and potentially improve the sustainability practices within the fishing industry, which could have positive implications for both conservation efforts and industry operations. An effective demonstration of tori lines could lead to their broader adoption, potentially reducing the impact of longline fisheries on seabird populations.

For specific stakeholders, the outcomes of this experiment could have disparate effects. Environmental groups might support these efforts if they prove to enhance seabird safety effectively. However, this will depend on the transparency and comprehensiveness of the results shared post-experiment. Conversely, fishermen and industry members could view this as an opportunity to streamline operations by potentially reducing regulatory requirements if tori lines are proven effective.

In summary, the document outlines a significant step taken by NMFS toward sustainable fishing practices. Yet, additional detail on certain aspects—such as evaluation methods, environmental impacts, and financial considerations—would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the experiment's scope and implications.

Issues

  • • The document lacks detailed information on the cost and funding source for the experimental fishing permit (EFP).

  • • There is no clear explanation of how the effectiveness of tori lines will be measured or evaluated.

  • • The language regarding the exemption from normal requirements north of 23° N (strategic offal discharge and blue-dyed bait) could benefit from further clarification on the reasoning behind this exemption.

  • • The document could be enhanced by including potential environmental impacts or outcomes expected from the use of tori lines.

  • • The document does not specify any potential risks or drawbacks associated with the experimental use of tori lines.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 396
Sentences: 12
Entities: 52

Language

Nouns: 140
Verbs: 24
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.64
Average Sentence Length:
33.00
Token Entropy:
4.86
Readability (ARI):
19.93

Reading Time

about a minute or two