Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission got some paperwork from different natural gas companies about changing their prices and reporting refunds. People who have something to say about these changes need to do it by February or March 2021, following special rules.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has announced it has received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. Various companies, including Houston Pipe Line Company LP, Energy Transfer Fuel, LP, and Red Bluff Express Pipeline, LLC, have filed these reports under different docket numbers. Each filing contains specific tariff updates or rate elections intended to be effective from the beginning of 2021, with varying comment and protest due dates in February and March 2021. Interested parties must follow specific rules to intervene or protest these proceedings by the designated deadlines.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), announcing that it has received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports from various companies. These reports, associated with different docket numbers, detail specific tariff updates or rate elections to take effect at the start of 2021. The document provides information on the filed date and sets comment and protest deadlines in February and March 2021.
General Summary
The notice includes a range of filings from companies such as Houston Pipe Line Company LP, Energy Transfer Fuel, LP, and Red Bluff Express Pipeline, LLC. Each entity has submitted tariff updates per the regulatory requirements, and these are meant to be effective around January 1, 2021. The document also outlines the process for submitting comments or protests and emphasizes the necessity for timely submissions according to FERC's regulations.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One of the primary concerns with this document is its reliance on acronyms like COFT, FL&U, and EPC, which may be unfamiliar to those not well-versed in energy terminology. The document also makes reference to several regulatory codes and sections, such as § 4(d) and 18 CFR 385.211, without further explanation. This complexity can pose a barrier for the general public or stakeholders who do not have a specialized legal or industry background.
The document uses a formal tone and legal jargon, which might be difficult for laypersons to understand without additional context or research. The lack of definitions and explanations can potentially obscure critical information for stakeholders or interested parties.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this document might seem inaccessible due to its complex language and procedural references. While it does inform about the changes in pipeline rates, the significance of these changes might not be immediately clear to consumers or small business owners unless they are directly involved in energy markets or regulation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders within the energy sector, especially those operating in service regions of the mentioned pipelines, the document holds significant importance. Changes in tariff rates or refund reports can have direct financial implications for businesses reliant on natural gas supplies. Companies listed in the notice, such as Houston Pipe Line Company LP and Energy Transfer Fuel, LP, along with others, will need to ensure compliance with updated tariffs.
Additionally, legal professionals and industry experts involved in energy regulatory affairs might find this notice crucial for advising their clients or adjusting strategic operations to align with new rates. Public service entities and regulatory bodies must monitor these changes closely to anticipate any downstream effects on energy markets and consumers.
In summary, while the document fulfills a formal regulatory requirement to inform interested parties about rate changes, it could benefit from being more accessible by providing clearer explanations and context. This would aid broader understanding and engagement from all potential stakeholders.
Issues
• The document uses numerous acronyms (e.g., COFT, FL&U, EPC) without providing definitions, which could be confusing for readers unfamiliar with the terminology.
• The document includes various parties and their filings without providing context or explanation for potential stakeholders who are not familiar with the natural gas pipeline rate filing process.
• The document mentions a variety of section numbers and regulations (§ 4(d), 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, etc.) without explanation, which might be difficult for a layperson to understand without additional research.
• Comments and protest filing instructions mention specific dates and times without elaborating on the consequences of missing these deadlines.
• The language used in the document is formal and includes legal jargon, which may not be easily understood by the general public without further clarification.
• The document lacks an abstract or summary to provide a quick overview of the content, which could help readers grasp the essential details more efficiently.