FR 2021-02392

Overview

Title

National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Human Genome Research Institute is having two secret virtual meetings in March 2021 to talk about special projects for studying human genes. They keep the meetings private so people's secrets stay safe.

Summary AI

The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) announced two upcoming closed meetings. These meetings, happening in March 2021, are part of special emphasis panels focused on reviewing grant applications related to human genome research. The sessions will be held virtually and are closed to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy. Dr. Rudy O. Pozzatti is the Scientific Review Officer for these panels.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8370
Document #: 2021-02392
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8370-8370

AnalysisAI

The document, titled "National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings," announces two upcoming meetings for the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). Scheduled for March 2021, these meetings will take place virtually and remain closed to the public. They focus on reviewing grant applications related to human genome research. Dr. Rudy O. Pozzatti serves as the Scientific Review Officer for these panels.

General Summary

The NHGRI's announcement pertains to its Special Emphasis Panels (SEPs), one of which is named "ClinGen—SEP" and scheduled for March 8, 2021. The second, "Functional Characterization—SEP," occurs over two days, March 16-17, 2021. Both panels aim to review and evaluate specific grant applications. The reason for closing these meetings to the public is to protect confidential information, such as trade secrets and personal data of individuals tied to the applications.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues related to this document:

  1. Lack of Transparency: While the NHGRI justifies the closed nature of the meetings by citing the need to safeguard private information, this might raise concerns about transparency and accountability in the use of public funds dedicated to scientific research. Some may question whether enough information is provided to justify the secrecy.

  2. Legal References: The document refers to legal sections of the United States Code (Title 5 U.S.C., sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6)). For readers unfamiliar with legal jargon, these references might not be easily understood, potentially creating a barrier to comprehension for the general public.

  3. Privacy Considerations: The notice includes detailed contact information for Dr. Rudy O. Pozzatti. While this information is helpful for those needing further details about the meetings, it also raises potential privacy concerns about the exposure of personal contact details.

  4. Insufficient Justification: The document provides a broad rationale for closing the meetings due to confidentiality and privacy concerns, but lacks specific details as to why these particular panels are closed, which may not fully appease stakeholders advocating for transparent governance.

Impact on the Public

The closure of these meetings might affect public perception concerning the accountability of governmental committees managing public funds for scientific research. While safeguarding sensitive information is critical, it is essential for the government to balance this with transparent practices that facilitate public trust.

Impact on Stakeholders

  • Researchers and Academic Institutions: These stakeholders might be directly impacted by these meetings, particularly those who have submitted grant applications. The closed nature ensures the confidentiality of their proposals and any potentially patentable material.

  • Public and Advocacy Groups: These groups might express concern over transparency, as these meetings involve the allocation of public funds without a full public disclosure of meeting proceedings.

In summary, this document describes upcoming NHGRI meetings and their confidentiality rationale but also highlights ongoing debates about transparency and accountability in government operations.

Issues

  • • The notice indicates that the meetings will be closed to the public, which, while justified by the need to protect confidential information, may raise concerns about transparency and accountability regarding the use of public funds.

  • • The use of specific legal references (sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.) might not be immediately clear to all readers without background in legal statutes, which could hinder public understanding.

  • • The document lists detailed contact information for the Scientific Review Officer, which, while useful, could raise privacy concerns about the individual’s contact information being widely accessible.

  • • The document lacks an explicit rationale for why these specific meetings are closed, beyond general references to confidentiality and privacy, which might not satisfy all stakeholders looking for transparency in government operations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 439
Sentences: 18
Entities: 66

Language

Nouns: 187
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.59
Average Sentence Length:
24.39
Token Entropy:
4.56
Readability (ARI):
20.12

Reading Time

about a minute or two