Overview
Title
Release of Waybill Data
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Surface Transportation Board got a request from Iowa State University to use special train data that has secrets about train companies and shippers. If anyone thinks this is a bad idea, they have to tell the Board within 14 days from the notice.
Summary AI
The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Iowa State University to use data from their 1992-2018 Unmasked Carload Waybill Sample for research purposes. This data contains confidential information about railroads and shippers. Anyone who objects to the release of this data must submit their objections to the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days from the notice date. The procedures for releasing waybill data are outlined in the federal regulations.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document released by the Surface Transportation Board, dated February 4, 2021, discusses a request from Iowa State University to access confidential data from the Board's 1992-2018 Unmasked Carload Waybill Sample. This request is something that stakeholders, such as railroad companies and shippers, need to be aware of because the data in question contains sensitive information that directly pertains to their operations.
Summary of the Document
The Surface Transportation Board, which regulates railroads in the United States, has issued a public notice regarding a data request from Iowa State University. The university seeks access to a detailed dataset containing nearly three decades of information about rail carloads, including potentially sensitive details about railroads and shippers. The waybill data is historically confidential, which is why the Board has implemented a process for objections. Interested parties have 14 days from the notice publication date to file objections if they believe the release of such data may have adverse effects.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One notable issue is the lack of a concise abstract or clearly defined action stated in the metadata. This lack of detailed metadata may hinder understanding of the document's broader implications. Additionally, while the contact information is provided, it includes just a phone number. This could limit accessibility, as some might prefer communication through digital means like email. Moreover, the document references federal regulations (49 CFR 1244.9) without offering additional context for the general public, which might be unfamiliar with regulatory language.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, particularly those not entrenched in the sectors of transportation and logistics, this document may seem obscure. However, the manner in which such data is released can have broader implications for data privacy standards and the transparency of corporate and governmental operations. It raises considerations about how data is shared between public institutions and universities and the implications thereof in terms of competitive business practices.
Impact on Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders, like railroad companies and shippers, the implications are more direct. The release of such data could affect competitive dynamics within the industry. Companies might be concerned about the data revealing business operations or market strategies. Conversely, Iowa State University and similar educational institutions would likely see this potential data access as beneficial for conducting in-depth research that could drive advancements within the logistics and transportation sectors.
The document underscores the ongoing balance between data transparency and confidentiality, with particular focus on the academic use of industry information. The existing systems for contesting data releases offer a framework for addressing different stakeholder concerns, but it also highlights the need for clearer communication regarding the motivations and potential outcomes of such disclosures.
Issues
• The abstract in the metadata is null, which might indicate incomplete information about the document.
• The 'action' field in the metadata is null, which could mean that the intended action or purpose of the notice is not clearly stated.
• The document text does not provide an abstract overview or summary of the implications of granting Iowa State University access to the waybill data, making it difficult for a non-expert to understand the potential impact.
• The contact information is limited to a phone number without an email address, which could limit accessibility for individuals who prefer or require written communication.
• The document assumes familiarity with regulatory references such as '49 CFR 1244.9', which might not be easily understood by the general public without additional context or explanation.