FR 2021-02336

Overview

Title

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Approved Monitoring Service Providers

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government picked six companies to help watch over fish-catching boats to make sure they follow the rules, like having video cameras on board. This helps everyone play fair and keep the fish safe for the fishing years 2021 and 2022.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has approved six companies to provide monitoring services for the Northeast multispecies fishery during fishing years 2021 and 2022. These companies will offer at-sea and/or electronic monitoring services, which are necessary to meet regulations under the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan. The approval process ensures that these companies meet specific performance requirements. NMFS will continue to monitor their performance and may add more service providers if additional companies meet the necessary criteria.

Abstract

NMFS has approved six companies to provide Northeast multispecies sector at-sea and/or electronic monitoring services in fishing years 2021 and 2022. Regulations implementing the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan require at-sea and electronic monitoring companies to apply to, and be approved by, NMFS in order to be eligible to provide monitoring services to sectors. This action will allow sectors to contract for at-sea and electronic monitoring services with any of the approved service providers for fishing years 2021 and 2022.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8182
Document #: 2021-02336
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8182-8183

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register provides an official notification from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), regarding the approval of six companies that will provide monitoring services for the Northeast multispecies fishery for the years 2021 and 2022. These companies are responsible for offering at-sea and electronic monitoring to ensure compliance with sector regulations under the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan.

General Summary

This notification outlines the process by which NMFS has approved specific service providers for monitoring purposes. It is clear that these monitoring services are necessary components of the fishery management plan and indicate a move toward more regulated and controlled fishing activities. The approved companies have demonstrated the capability to meet application requirements and service standards necessary for efficient monitoring.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Firstly, while the document does mention the general criteria for approval, such as application completeness and the ability to meet performance requirements, it lacks detail. There is little explanation of what these performance requirements entail or how they are monitored, potentially raising concerns about the transparency of the selection process. Without clear criteria, stakeholders may perceive favoritism or bias in the approval process.

Secondly, the document's language, although precise, may come across as complex for individuals not familiar with regulatory frameworks and fisheries management. Legal and industry-specific terminology, such as references to regulatory codes and technical terms, might make it difficult for the general public to understand the full scope of the requirements or the significance of the decisions being made.

Additionally, there is an indication that two additional companies have not yet completed the approval process, which could have implications for the sectors depending on these services. Delays in their approval could affect the sectors' ability to negotiate contracts efficiently and operate within the regulated framework.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Overall, the broader public may not immediately recognize the direct impacts of this approval, but it plays a crucial role in sustainable fisheries management, which in turn affects food supply and marine ecological balance. By ensuring that monitoring services are in place, NMFS seeks to promote responsible fishing practices, which can positively impact seafood resources and long-term environmental sustainability.

For specific stakeholders, such as the approved companies, this document signifies a significant opportunity for business development through contracts with the fishing sectors. On the other hand, those companies whose applications remain incomplete may face challenges in gaining timely access to market opportunities, potentially affecting their financial and operational planning.

Fisheries themselves might experience increased operational oversight, which, while beneficial to resource management, could introduce additional compliance costs or logistical challenges. Nonetheless, the approved service providers are essential to maintaining the integrity and sustainability of fishing practices, aligning with broader conservation goals.

In conclusion, while the document establishes important regulatory compliance mechanisms, clarity in criteria and processes could improve transparency and stakeholder understanding. Access to monitoring services is essential for compliance with fishery management plans, impacting not just industry players but also contributing to the sustainability of marine resources, ultimately affecting the public in terms of food quality and ecological health.

Issues

  • • The document mentions approval of six companies to provide monitoring services but does not specify the criteria used for their selection clearly beyond completeness and sufficiency of applications and performance requirements. This could lead to a perception of favoritism if the criteria are not transparent.

  • • The language in the document is generally clear but might be considered complex for individuals not familiar with fisheries management, particularly with respect to the regulatory references (e.g., 50 CFR 648.87(b)(4)) and the industry-specific terms (e.g., 'at-sea monitoring').

  • • There is no detailed information about what the monitoring specifically entails, including what the 'performance requirements' are, which may lead to ambiguity.

  • • There could be a potential issue regarding the timeline for further approval of the two pending applications, as it might affect the sectors' ability to negotiate contracts if these approvals are delayed.

  • • The document assumes that readers will understand the importance of at-sea and electronic monitoring services and does not provide sufficient context on why these services are critical for sector operations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 880
Sentences: 32
Entities: 75

Language

Nouns: 330
Verbs: 88
Adjectives: 33
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 45

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.19
Average Sentence Length:
27.50
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
20.37

Reading Time

about 3 minutes