FR 2021-02317

Overview

Title

Discretionary Review by the Secretary of Labor

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government decided not to change the rules about how they review certain worker permissions because people didn't like the idea, and they want to think it over more carefully.

Summary AI

The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Labor have decided to withdraw a rule that was published on January 4, 2021, regarding H-2B temporary labor certification cases. This decision was made because they received a significant adverse comment during the public comment period. The rule aimed to extend the Department of Labor's system for reviewing these cases, but it will no longer take effect. Any future changes or rules may consider the feedback received from the public.

Abstract

Due to the receipt of a significant adverse comment, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Labor (Departments) are jointly withdrawing the January 4, 2021, direct final rule (DFR) that would have extended DOL's recently established system of discretionary Secretary of Labor review to H-2B temporary labor certification cases (H-2B cases) pending before or decided by the Department of Labor's Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals and made technical, conforming changes to regulations governing the timing and finality of those decisions and of decisions from the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board in H-2B cases.

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 7927
Document #: 2021-02317
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7927-7927

AnalysisAI

The document in question from the Federal Register presents a withdrawal of a proposed rule by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Labor regarding H-2B temporary labor certification cases. Originally published on January 4, 2021, the rule aimed to extend the Department of Labor's existing system for discretional review of cases by the Secretary of Labor. However, due to receiving a significant adverse comment during the public comment period, the Departments decided to retract the rule as of February 2, 2021.

General Summary

The intended rule, as originally published, sought to implement discretionary review procedures for H-2B cases, which involve temporary non-agricultural workers. This would have affected cases pending before or decisions made by the Department of Labor's Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals. The withdrawal was formalized before the rule could take effect, and any considerations for future rules in this area may take into account the public feedback received.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One major issue is the lack of specific details concerning the adverse comment that prompted the rule's withdrawal. This lack of disclosure leaves the public and stakeholders without a clear understanding of the objections or concerns that halted the rule's implementation. Additionally, there's redundancy in the abstract and summary sections of the document, which may complicate comprehension for readers trying to grasp the core message quickly.

Moreover, the reference to multiple regulatory amendments without detailed explanations could be confusing for those not familiar with administrative procedures. Lastly, the document does not provide insights into the potential impacts or consequences of the withdrawal, particularly how this affects existing processes or stakeholders reliant on the H-2B program.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the withdrawal of the rule means that, for now, there will be no change in how the Department of Labor reviews H-2B cases. This decision could imply stability in the current process for those less familiar with the intricacies of labor certification processes. However, it also signifies a pause in any potential improvements or changes that could have aided in streamlining labor certifications.

Impact on Stakeholders

The withdrawal may have varying effects on specific stakeholders. Employers who depend on the H-2B program may find uncertainty, as the potential streamlining or alteration of review processes will not take place as expected. Conversely, some stakeholders, including worker advocacy groups who might have opposed the rule, could view this withdrawal positively, ensuring that current review processes remain unchanged.

Overall, it reflects the complex balance between regulatory adjustments and stakeholder feedback, portraying an administrative landscape that must be navigated mindfully to address the diverse interests and needs involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not disclose the nature or details of the significant adverse comment received, which would provide more context for the withdrawal.

  • • The abstract and summary sections repeat similar information, which may be redundant and complicate understanding for the reader.

  • • There is potential complexity in understanding the full implications of the withdrawal without additional background information on the direct final rule or the comments received.

  • • The document refers to multiple amendments and federal regulations (e.g., 20 CFR part 655, 29 CFR parts 18 and 503) without providing a detailed explanation of what these entail, which might not be clear to a non-expert reader.

  • • The document lacks details on the potential impacts or consequences of the withdrawal on stakeholders involved in the H-2B program.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 531
Sentences: 14
Entities: 77

Language

Nouns: 178
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.66
Average Sentence Length:
37.93
Token Entropy:
4.85
Readability (ARI):
22.84

Reading Time

about 2 minutes