FR 2021-02287

Overview

Title

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of General Medical Sciences is going to have a secret video meeting on March 19, 2021, to discuss special projects for medical research. They need to keep it private to protect important secrets and personal details.

Summary AI

The National Institute of General Medical Sciences announced a closed meeting on March 19, 2021, for the review of grant applications related to the Institutional Development Award Program Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Research. The meeting will be held as a video conference and is closed to the public to protect confidential information such as trade secrets and personal details of individuals involved. The contact for this meeting is Dr. Saraswathy Seetharam, the Scientific Review Officer.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8211
Document #: 2021-02287
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8211-8211

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a formal notice issued by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, under the Department of Health and Human Services. It announces a closed meeting scheduled for March 19, 2021, focused on reviewing grant applications within the Institutional Development Award Program Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Research. This meeting is closed to public participation to maintain confidentiality over sensitive information, such as trade secrets and personal data.

General Summary

This Federal Register notice informs the public about the administrative activities of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The purpose of the specified meeting is to review and evaluate grant applications, a crucial process that ensures the funding of projects aligned with the institution’s mission. The closed nature of the meeting reflects the need to protect confidential information, which is common in situations where proprietary information and personal data are involved.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The primary concern highlighted by this document is the protection of proprietary information and personal privacy. Federal guidelines, as defined by Title 5 U.S.C., mandate that meetings involving confidential materials be closed to the public. This ensures a secure environment where sensitive discussions can occur without risk of unauthorized disclosure.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document serves as an assurance that the National Institutes of Health has processes in place to protect confidential information while conducting essential business, such as the allocation of research funding. While the meeting is not open to the public, the outcomes from such evaluations can lead to advancements in medical research and healthcare improvements, which ultimately benefit society at large.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders, particularly those who have submitted grant applications, this document may invoke varying reactions. Applicants may be reassured knowing that their applications and accompanying sensitive information are protected during the review process. However, there is also a lack of transparency for those who are not directly involved, leading to potential concerns about the fairness or thoroughness of the review process.

Scientists and researchers stand to benefit greatly if their projects are funded, as this can lead to significant advancements in their work. Institutions and organizations involved with the Institutional Development Award Program likewise benefit from the potential financial support to propel their health initiatives forward.

In summary, while the document addresses necessary protective measures for confidentiality, it underscores the balance between safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining transparency. Stakeholders across the board may appreciate this diligence, though public inaccessibility may raise questions about the review process’s openness and accessibility.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 366
Sentences: 11
Entities: 49

Language

Nouns: 151
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.29
Average Sentence Length:
33.27
Token Entropy:
4.72
Readability (ARI):
23.25

Reading Time

about a minute or two