FR 2021-02217

Overview

Title

Change In Control; ECA Liquefaction, S. de R.L. de C.V.

Agencies

ELI5 AI

ECA Liquefaction had a change in who owns it, like how you might trade toys with a friend, and now people can say if they're okay with this change or not within a certain time; if no one says anything, the change will be a-okay.

Summary AI

The Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy received a Statement of Change in Control from ECA Liquefaction, which details a change in its ownership. The change occurred when Total acquired a stake in ECA LNG Holdings, impacting the ownership held by Sempra LNG and Infraestructura Energética Nova. This notice invites public comments and interventions regarding the change in control affecting ECA Liquefaction's authorization to export natural gas. If no objections are raised, the change will be approved 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register.

Abstract

The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) gives notice of receipt of a Statement of Change in Control (Statement) filed by ECA Liquefaction, S. de R.L. de C.V. (ECA Liquefaction) in the above-referenced docket on January 7, 2021. The Statement describes a change in upstream ownership of ECA Liquefaction. The Statement was filed under the Natural Gas Act (NGA).

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8004
Document #: 2021-02217
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8004-8005

AnalysisAI

The document from the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy announces a significant change in control related to ECA Liquefaction. This change arose when Total, a French energy company, acquired a 16.6% stake in ECA LNG Holdings. Previously, Sempra LNG and Infraestructura Energética Nova (IEnova) each held an equal 50% stake. Post-transaction, both Sempra LNG and IEnova maintain a 41.7% interest. The document serves as a formal notice inviting the public to comment or intervene if they have concerns about how this ownership change might affect ECA Liquefaction’s authorization to export natural gas.

General Summary

The notice underscores a shift in ownership of a company involved in the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG), reflecting broader changes in the global energy market where ownership stakes can influence operational control and strategic direction. The publication invites stakeholders and the public to voice objections or support for this change. Should there be no objections within the specified timeframe, the change will be sanctioned 30 days after its notice in the Federal Register.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several potential issues arise from the document, particularly regarding accessibility and clarity. The use of abbreviations like 'FE,' 'DOE,' and 'NGA' without elaboration may confuse readers unfamiliar with these terms. The document is also replete with business and legal terminology, such as "protests," "motions to intervene," and details about "ownership interests," which can be difficult for someone without a business or legal background to understand.

Additionally, it references specific orders (e.g., DOE/FE Order No. 4364) without offering context or details about what these orders represent, leaving some readers uncertain about their significance. The citations and footnotes included could also pose an accessibility challenge, as they rely on specialized knowledge or access to further regulatory texts.

Public Impact

For the general public, this change in control notice is relevant primarily because it could influence natural gas markets, energy prices, or broader economic implications, depending on how the new ownership impacts company operations. Additionally, energy security and environmental factors could be influenced by how ECA Liquefaction and its new shareholders prioritize their agenda.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For certain stakeholders, such as competing energy companies or local communities near LNG operations, the change in control could have immediate implications. Companies like Sempra LNG and IEnova, which see a reduction in ownership percentage, might experience shifts in their operational influence. Conversely, Total's entry into a substantial holding positions it to influence strategic decisions, potentially aligning with broader corporate policies related to its existing customer relationship through subsidiaries.

In conclusion, while the document lays out a routine procedural aspect of corporate operations within a specialized energy market, its broader implications warrant scrutiny. Stakeholders and informed community members may want to understand how such corporate reshuffling impacts broader regional or economic trends in energy production and supply.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical acronyms such as 'FE,' 'DOE,' and 'NGA' without providing full definitions within the text, which may be unclear to readers not familiar with them.

  • • The explanation of ownership percentages and company relationships in the Summary of Change in Control section is complex and may be difficult for readers without a business or legal background to understand.

  • • The use of legal and regulatory jargon, such as 'protests, motions to intervene, or notices of intervention,' could be unclear for the general public.

  • • The document references specific orders (e.g., DOE/FE Order No. 4364) without providing context or explaining what these orders entail, which may be confusing.

  • • The document includes citations and footnotes that might not be easily accessible or understood without further context or access to referenced materials.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,443
Sentences: 38
Entities: 162

Language

Nouns: 534
Verbs: 93
Adjectives: 37
Adverbs: 19
Numbers: 79

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.05
Average Sentence Length:
37.97
Token Entropy:
5.26
Readability (ARI):
24.77

Reading Time

about 6 minutes