FR 2021-02121

The document under consideration is a temporary rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), which is a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This rule focuses on the prohibition of directed fishing for Pacific cod using pot gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska. The key reason for this action is to ensure that the fishing activities do not exceed the set limits for Pacific cod during the 2021 season. The rule came into effect on January 22, 2021, and will be active until June 10, 2021. The urgency of this action stems from recent data that necessitated immediate closure, without allowing the typical period for public comments.

General Concerns and Issues

A few significant issues arise from the document. First, there is a lack of financial transparency. The document does not provide specific details about the costs associated with enforcing this temporary closure, which could have financial implications for the community or industries relying on this fishery.

There is also concern regarding the lack of analysis on the socio-economic impacts of the closure. The document does not delve into how local economies or fishing businesses might be affected, leaving stakeholders without a clear understanding of how this closure could influence their livelihoods.

Moreover, the timing of the data that informed this decision spotlights potential transparency issues. The data, which prompted the closure, became available shortly before the rule was enacted, possibly leading to questions about the timeliness of data transparency and whether stakeholders had adequate notice.

Additionally, while the document sets aside a small portion of the catch as bycatch, it provides insufficient details on how this will be managed or monitored. This lack of detail raises potential compliance and enforcement concerns.

The document also contains legal jargon and references specific regulations without providing explanations, possibly making it less accessible to individuals who are not familiar with these terms or those who may need to look up the associated legal documentation to fully comprehend the ruling's implications.

Impact on the Public

This decision has varied implications for the broader public and specific stakeholders. Broadly, the rule aims to sustainably manage fishery resources, which is beneficial for maintaining ecological balance and preserving fish stocks for future generations. However, for the general public, particularly those in Alaska and surrounding regions, this temporary closure might mean more regulatory oversight and a potential increase in the cost of Pacific cod—a staple in some communities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For those directly engaged in the fishing industry—such as vessel owners, crews, and associated businesses—the impact can be considerable. The abrupt halt in directed fishing may result in reduced income, especially if the Pacific cod fishery is a significant part of their operations. This closure might also affect supply chains, processing facilities, and local economies that depend on these activities.

Conversely, this rule can be seen positively by environmental advocates and public policy supporters focused on conservation. By ensuring that fishing does not surpass the allowable catch limits, the NMFS is acting in favor of long-term sustainability and the health of marine ecosystems.

Overall, while the document underscores important regulatory measures, it highlights areas where clarity and consideration of broader impacts are needed to balance conservation efforts with economic realities.