Overview
Title
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.; Notice of Request for Extension of Time
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage wants more time to finish a big storage project in West Virginia because they've been slowed down by COVID-19 and bad weather. They asked for extra time until August 2021, and people have 15 days to say what they think about this request.
Summary AI
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. (formerly Dominion Energy Transmission) has requested an extension from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to continue work on its Bridgeport Storage Field project in West Virginia. Originally scheduled for completion by February 22, 2021, the company now seeks an extension until August 22, 2021, due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and weather challenges. The Commission has opened a 15-day period for comments and interventions regarding this request. The Commission typically handles these requests directly, especially when there is contestation, and aims to respond within 45 days if disputes arise.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc., previously known as Dominion Energy Transmission, has submitted a request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for an extension of time. This extension pertains to their ongoing project at the Bridgeport Storage Field located in West Virginia. Originally, the project completion was slated for February 22, 2021, but they are now asking for an extension until August 22, 2021. The delays are attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and adverse weather conditions.
Summary of the Document
The document outlines a procedural notice from FERC, detailing Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage's request for additional time to complete certain construction activities. The company cites issues related to the global COVID-19 pandemic and weather conditions as primary factors in needing more time. In response, FERC has initiated a 15-day public comment period, inviting stakeholders and interested parties to submit their thoughts and concerns about the proposed extension.
Significant Issues and Concerns
There are several notable concerns regarding the notice:
Lack of Detailed Justification: The company mentions COVID-19 and weather as reasons for the delay, but does not provide detailed explanations or specific challenges faced. This lack of detailed justification may prompt further scrutiny and could necessitate more in-depth documentation.
Complex Language Used: The document is laden with legal jargon and references to specific regulations (e.g., CFR sections), which could be complex for the average reader. Individuals unfamiliar with regulatory language might find it challenging to grasp the full implications of the document.
References to Specific Docket Numbers: The mention of docket numbers and past orders, without additional context, could make it difficult for a general audience to understand the historical or procedural context of the request.
Economic and Community Impact: The document does not delve into the potential economic or community impacts of delaying the project. Stakeholders and the public might benefit from understanding potential cost implications or how the project aligns with public needs and interests.
Broader Public Impact
The request for an extension can have varied implications for the public. On the one hand, witnessing a project delay might be frustrating for local communities expecting timely project completion. Additionally, stakeholders could be impacted by extended timelines that might affect employment or local business revenues tied to project activities.
Conversely, ensuring thorough and uninterrupted construction efforts by granting an extension might lead to better outcomes and safer execution. It implies that the company is committed to maintaining quality standards and regulatory compliance without rushing the process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as local governments, construction workers, and businesses within the vicinity, might be impacted differently by this extension. Local governments need to consider the regulatory and logistical implications of extended construction phases. At the same time, construction workers and personnel might face employment uncertainty or altered work schedules.
Moreover, environmental groups and residents in the area may have concerns about whether previous environmental assessments adequately cover such extensions. They may need reassurances that environmental protections remain a priority in altered timelines.
Overall, while the request is procedural, it opens up a broader dialogue on the importance of transparency, clarity, and community engagement in significant infrastructure projects. Addressing these concerns effectively is crucial for balancing regulatory demands with public interests.
Issues
• The document does not provide a detailed justification for the delay beyond mentioning COVID-19 and weather, which might warrant further scrutiny or requirement for more specific details.
• The language used in the notice, such as references to specific CFR sections and legal jargon, might be complex or difficult to understand for individuals not familiar with regulatory language or legal terms.
• The document refers to specific docket numbers and orders (e.g., Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, 170 FERC 61,144), but these references might not be easily accessible or understandable to a general audience without additional context or explanation.
• There is no discussion on the potential impacts or cost implications of extending the project deadline, which could be important for stakeholders or the public to understand the broader consequences of this extension request.