FR 2021-01975

Overview

Title

Certain Corrosion Inhibitors From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Commerce Department found that some products from China, called corrosion inhibitors, are being sold in the U.S. for too cheap, which isn't fair to American companies. So, they're making rules to make sure these products cost the right amount and didn't work right with the investigation.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has determined that certain corrosion inhibitors imported from China are being sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. The investigation into this issue covered the period from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. As a result of this finding, the U.S. will continue to suspend the liquidation of relevant imports and require cash deposits to cover the difference between normal value and U.S. sale prices. The final determination relies on adverse facts available for some Chinese entities that did not fully cooperate with the investigation, resulting in significant dumping margins.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion inhibitors (corrosion inhibitors) from the People's Republic of China (China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7532
Document #: 2021-01975
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7532-7535

AnalysisAI

The recent notice from the Department of Commerce outlines its determination that certain corrosion inhibitors imported from China have been sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This determination follows an investigation period that spanned from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. As a result of these findings, U.S. authorities will continue to hold the liquidation of these imports and demand cash deposits, essentially requiring importers to cover the difference between what is viewed as a fair price and the lower prices at which they have been sold in the U.S.

General Summary

The notice conveys a complex apparatus of regulations aimed at protecting U.S. industries from unfair competition due to dumping—selling goods below cost to gain market share. The determination covers tolyltriazole and benzotriazole, chemical compounds utilized as corrosion inhibitors. The document elaborates on the technical aspects of these substances, assigns specific duties, and stresses practices applied in this international trade context.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document is heavy with legal and trade-specific language, making it difficult for those without expertise in international trade law to fully comprehend. Terms like CAS registry numbers and Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings feature prominently but lack explanatory context. Furthermore, while the document mentions the practice of assigning combination rates and adverse facts available, it does so without elucidating how these practices work, which can confuse readers unfamiliar with these trade policy intricacies.

Public Impact

The broader public might notice an indirect impact, mainly through the potential changes in prices of products using these chemical inhibitors. If companies absorb the additional costs due to cash deposits and duties, the higher cost might reflect in the goods they manufacture. However, U.S. businesses competing with imports potentially benefit if these measures enable more equitable market conditions, potentially safeguarding U.S. jobs and industries.

Impact on Stakeholders

The impact on stakeholders will vary significantly. For American manufacturers of corrosion inhibitors and related products, this determination may provide relief from predatory pricing practices and allow a more competitive market stance. However, importers of these substances from China may face increased costs, potentially affecting their supply chains and profit margins. Conversely, some consumers might experience higher prices for end-products that utilize these chemical compounds if costs are passed down the line.

Conclusion

While the Department of Commerce’s decision is a technical safeguard to ensure fair trade practices, its dense and specialized nature highlights a lack of accessible communication to the general public. Understanding the specific economic consequences remains a challenge for most readers, as the document does not elaborate on the possible downstream effects of these trade determinations. Nonetheless, its guidance stands crucial for stakeholders directly engaged in or affected by the international trade of these chemical compounds.

Issues

  • • The document is heavily reliant on complex legal and trade terminology, which may be difficult for laypersons to understand.

  • • The document references several technical terms and codes related to chemical compounds (e.g., CAS registry numbers, HTSUS subheadings) without providing simplified explanations or context for non-specialists.

  • • There is no discussion about the potential economic impact or consequences of imposing antidumping duties, which might be important for understanding the broader implications of this determination.

  • • The policy specifics regarding the calculation of combination rates might be unclear to those not familiar with 'Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination Rates' as described in Policy Bulletin 05.1.

  • • The document mentions certain country-specific adjustments and practices, such as the 'China-Wide Entity Rate' and the 'Use of Adverse Facts Available', without offering an explanation of how these practices are typically implemented or their rationale.

  • • The language used in explaining legal and administrative processes (e.g., regarding administrative protective orders or antidumping duties) may be unnecessarily dense, making it less accessible to the general public.

  • • There is an assumption of reader familiarity with previous documents and decisions (e.g., Preliminary Determination, Issues and Decision Memorandum), which are not included in the document, potentially reducing the reader's understanding if they have not read those documents.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 2,688
Sentences: 89
Entities: 198

Language

Nouns: 929
Verbs: 194
Adjectives: 153
Adverbs: 41
Numbers: 95

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.40
Average Sentence Length:
30.20
Token Entropy:
5.63
Readability (ARI):
22.68

Reading Time

about 10 minutes