FR 2021-01961

Overview

Title

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Small Business Administration (SBA) wants to know what people think about some questions they ask to help small businesses. They need permission from a big office to ask these questions, and they are giving everyone until March 1, 2021, to say if they think these questions are helpful or not.

Summary AI

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is asking for public comments on a proposed information collection that requires approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This request is related to obtaining feedback on SBA's services and programs. The comments should focus on whether the information collection is necessary, the accuracy of burden estimates, and ways to improve the quality of information. The deadline for submitting comments is March 1, 2021.

Abstract

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and OMB procedures, SBA is publishing this notice to allow all interested member of the public an additional 30 days to provide comments on the proposed collection of information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7610
Document #: 2021-01961
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7610-7611

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Small Business Administration (SBA) published in the Federal Register. The SBA is requesting public comments on a proposed information collection that requires approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, the SBA has provided this notice to allow interested parties an additional 30 days to contribute their opinions and insights.

Summary of the Document

This request involves feedback gathering on the SBA's services and programs, focusing on whether the collection is necessary for the agency to perform its functions effectively. Comments are also requested on the accuracy of burden estimates and potential ways to improve the quality, utility, and clarity of the information. Comments must be submitted by March 1, 2021.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There is a notable discrepancy in the "Description of Respondents" figures, where two different numbers (500,000 and 5,000,000) are listed under the same heading. This typographical error can cause confusion and undermines the clarity of the document. Moreover, the text does not provide detailed information about the nature of the information collection. This absence of specifics can make it difficult for the public to evaluate the necessity and utility of the collection process.

Additionally, while the solicitation of public comments mentions areas for potential improvement, it lacks concrete examples or contexts. This vagueness could leave stakeholders uncertain about what specific programs or areas might see enhancements. Furthermore, the "Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative and Quantitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery" is not thoroughly explained, which could hinder understanding of its scope and purpose.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document represents an opportunity to engage with the SBA's information collection processes and influence potential future service improvements. However, the procedural language and lack of specific examples might pose a barrier for those unfamiliar with such government proceedings or jargon.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders, such as program participants and stakeholders identified in the document, this notice may directly influence their experiences and satisfaction levels with SBA programs and services. Providing effective feedback can lead to improved service delivery and communication, training opportunities, and operational changes that could positively affect their interactions with the SBA.

In conclusion, while the document opens a channel for public participation, it falls short in conveying clear and precise information about the proposed process, potentially limiting meaningful engagement and understanding. Correcting errors and elaborating on the scope and context of the information collection could enhance its clarity and effectiveness in gathering valuable public input.

Issues

  • • The metadata and text document contain a discrepancy in 'Description of Respondents' numbers, listed twice with the same heading but different numbers (500,000 vs. 5000,000). This appears to be a typographical error that needs correction.

  • • The text lacks specifics on the nature of the information collection, making it difficult to evaluate the necessity and usefulness of the collection to the agency's functions.

  • • The document does not provide specific examples or contexts for 'communication, training or changes in operations,' which could leave readers unclear as to what specific areas might see improvements.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of what 'Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative and Quantitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery' entails, which could help readers understand the scope better.

  • • The language used in the solicitation for public comments section may be considered overly procedural and vague, especially for readers unfamiliar with government processes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 498
Sentences: 19
Entities: 39

Language

Nouns: 182
Verbs: 34
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.61
Average Sentence Length:
26.21
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
21.34

Reading Time

about a minute or two