FR 2021-01953

Overview

Title

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Small Business Administration (SBA) wants to check how well some building projects are finished by using information from companies that help with money guarantees. They are asking people to give them advice on whether this is important and how it can be better before March 1, 2021.

Summary AI

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information regarding the Surety Bond Guarantee Program. This collection aims to update the status of completed contracts and provide a final accounting of contractor performances. SBA is inviting public comments until March 1, 2021, on whether this information gathering is necessary, if the burden estimates are accurate, and how it might be improved. Interested parties can send their comments to SBA's Agency Clearance Officer or OMB’s SBA Desk Officer.

Abstract

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and OMB procedures, SBA is publishing this notice to allow all interested member of the public an additional 30 days to provide comments on the proposed collection of information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7610
Document #: 2021-01953
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7610-7610

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register provides information about the Small Business Administration's (SBA) proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This proposal seeks to approve a collection of information related to the SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee Program. The purpose of this initiative is to collect data that updates the status of completed contracts and provides a final accounting of contractor performance. The SBA is allowing additional time for public comment until March 1, 2021, to consider whether this information gathering is necessary or if improvements can be incorporated into the process.

Summary of the Document

The SBA is requesting input from the public on the practicality and efficiency of the proposed information collection. This effort is part of a broader strategy to support small businesses, particularly in how surety companies interact with these entities. Comments are solicited pertaining to several aspects: the necessity of information collection, whether the estimated burden of this process on respondents is accurate, and potential ways to improve the quality and clarity of the collected data.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several issues emerge from the text. Firstly, the document does not specify the cost implications or budgetal aspects associated with this data collection from surety companies. Furthermore, while the document outlines the purpose of gathering information, it lacks specifics on what changes or impacts are anticipated from these updates or the final reports. Moreover, there is no detailed discussion on how this might impact surety companies regarding their operations or associated costs.

The document also does not indicate whether there are specific technological solutions or techniques being considered to reduce the respondent burden. Lastly, there is no mention of a feedback mechanism to ensure that suggestions collected during the comment period are evaluated and that stakeholders understand how their input is being integrated, which could potentially enhance the transparency and effectiveness of the process.

Impacts on the Public

For the general public, particularly those involved with small businesses, the proposed information collection could offer some benefits if it successfully streamlines interactions between surety companies and contractors. More accurate and timely data could potentially pave the way for more equitable and efficient support for small businesses.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as surety companies, might feel a direct impact from the proposed data collection procedures. Depending on how onerous these data collection tasks are, it could introduce additional workload and thus operational costs. However, if effectively managed and streamlined, these processes might positively influence the business strategies of surety companies by providing better oversight and management of contract completions.

Overall, while the initiative appears well-intentioned in aiding both small businesses and surety companies, the document lacks clarity in key areas that assure stakeholders of minimal burden and efficient execution. Engaging stakeholders in a more transparent dialogue could potentially optimize outcomes for all parties involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information about the cost implications or budget allocations related to the information collection from surety companies.

  • • The purpose of the information collection is mentioned, but specifics on what changes or impacts are expected from the updated status or final accounting are not clear.

  • • The potential impact of this information collection on surety companies and how it might influence their operations or costs is not detailed.

  • • The language does not specify any particular techniques or technology solutions currently being considered to minimize the burden of information collection.

  • • There is no mention of a feedback mechanism for suggestions collected during the comment period, which could enhance transparency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 444
Sentences: 16
Entities: 34

Language

Nouns: 163
Verbs: 30
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.31
Average Sentence Length:
27.75
Token Entropy:
4.85
Readability (ARI):
20.66

Reading Time

about a minute or two