FR 2021-01869

Overview

Title

Village of Gouverneur, New York; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The village of Gouverneur in New York wants to keep using a special machine to make electricity from a river. Before they say yes, a group of people will check if it’s safe for nature and listen to what everyone thinks about it.

Summary AI

The Village of Gouverneur, New York, has filed an application to continue operating its 160-kilowatt Gouverneur Hydroelectric Project on the Oswegatchie River. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission plans to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project, as staff believes it won't significantly affect the environment. The EA will be shared for review, and comments from the public will be considered before the final licensing decision. The assessment is expected to be completed within a year of this notice's release date.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7373
Document #: 2021-01869
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7373-7373

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register, dated January 28, 2021, discusses an important step in the licensing process of the Gouverneur Hydroelectric Project located on the Oswegatchie River in Gouverneur, New York. Managed by the Village of Gouverneur, this 160-kilowatt hydroelectric project has been operating without a formal federal license. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced its intention to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate the impact of this project on the environment.

Summary

The notice primarily concerns the preparation of an EA, an evaluation required whenever a major federal action might significantly affect the environment. In this instance, based on preliminary data and comments, the Commission staff does not expect the licensing to present a significant environmental impact. The EA will be circulated for review and will incorporate public commentary before the final decision on the licensing is made. The document also specifies that the assessment will be completed within a year of the notice's issuance.

Significant Issues

Several issues and concerns arise from the document:

  • Lack of Detailed Environmental Information: While it is noted that the EA will be carried out, the document lacks details regarding specific potential environmental impacts. This scarcity of information might leave stakeholders, particularly those concerned with environmental preservation, wanting more clarity at this stage.

  • Unspecified Timeline: Although the document mentions a one-year timeframe for the EA's completion, it does not provide specific interim milestones or deadlines. This omission could be seen as a lack of transparency for those tracking the project's progress.

  • Limited Contact Information: The notice provides only one contact person for inquiries, which could be inadequate if many stakeholders or individuals have questions. This limitation may pose difficulties, especially if the designated contact is unavailable.

  • Influence of Public Comments: The notice states that comments will be analyzed and considered but does not elaborate on how these inputs might influence the final decision. This lack of clarity can lead to concerns about the real impact of stakeholder feedback on the decision-making process.

  • Complexity of Language: Although the document is relatively clear, some regulatory language might be challenging for individuals less familiar with such processes, potentially limiting broader public engagement.

Public Impact

The broader public might find this process generally reassuring, as it indicates FERC's commitment to environmental oversight, ensuring projects do not proceed without due diligence regarding potential ecological impacts. However, the absence of detailed environmental analysis at this stage and a lack of clear interim milestones might lead to skepticism about the thoroughness and openness of the process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Local Residents and Environmentalists: Individuals in the area and environmental advocacy groups might be particularly concerned about ecological impacts and thus disappointed by the lack of detailed information. They may feel inadequately informed to contribute meaningful input during the commentary phase.

  • Village of Gouverneur and Project Proponents: This notice represents progress in formalizing the hydroelectric project’s operations. These stakeholders likely view the announcement of the EA as a positive step towards securing a license.

  • General Public and Ratepayers: For those interested in local energy resources or utility rates, the process signals steps towards regulatory approval and could indicate potential long-term changes in local energy resources or pricing structures.

This commentary underscores the necessity for transparency, clarity, and thorough engagement with impacted communities in regulatory processes, particularly those concerning environmental assessments and energy infrastructure projects.

Issues

  • • The document lacks detailed information about the potential environmental impacts of the Gouverneur Hydroelectric Project, which could leave some stakeholders inadequately informed.

  • • The notice does not provide a specific timeline for when the Environmental Assessment (EA) will be issued, other than the general 1-year timeframe, which could be perceived as lacking transparency about the project's progression.

  • • Contact information for questions is limited to one individual, which may not be sufficient if there is a high volume of inquiries or if the contact person is unavailable.

  • • The document specifies that comments will be analyzed and considered but does not detail how stakeholder input will affect the final licensing decision, which could lead to perceptions of reduced stakeholder influence.

  • • The language used, though mostly clear, could be simplified slightly to ensure broader accessibility and understanding, especially for those not familiar with regulatory or environmental assessment processes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 382
Sentences: 20
Entities: 42

Language

Nouns: 113
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.77
Average Sentence Length:
19.10
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
14.11

Reading Time

about a minute or two