FR 2021-01813

The document in question is a notice issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding an upcoming meeting of the Drone Advisory Committee (DAC). Scheduled for February 24, 2021, this meeting will be conducted virtually and livestreamed for the general public via FAA's social media platforms. The DAC, established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, plays a significant role in advising the FAA on matters related to the integration of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).

General Summary

The announcement informs the public of an open virtual meeting where various drone-related topics will be discussed. Key components of the agenda include updates from the FAA, a review of industry-led technical topics, and the establishment of new business and agenda items. The meeting emphasizes transparency and public involvement by providing a means for written statements to be submitted, though it does not accommodate oral presentations due to time constraints.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document:

1. Lack of Specificity on Agenda Topics: While the document outlines a general agenda, it lacks detailed information on the specific subjects to be discussed under "Industry-Led Technical Topics." This vagueness may leave interested parties unsure of what to expect or how relevant issues will be addressed.

2. Process for Submitting Written Statements: The document specifies that the public may submit written statements, but it does not clearly indicate the process for submission, aside from contacting the designated officer. This omission could create confusion or barriers to participation for those who wish to have their voices heard.

3. Transparency and Follow-up on Public Input: There is no information on how submitted statements will be utilized or whether the public can expect any follow-up or response. This may raise concerns about the committee's accountability and the transparency of its actions.

Broad Public Impact

The document underscores the FAA's commitment to public inclusion in discussions around UAS integration, an area with significant implications for industry, safety, and technology. By livestreaming the event, the FAA allows greater access for the public, fostering wider engagement with stakeholders.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For industry stakeholders, this meeting represents an opportunity to align with FAA objectives and influence the direction of policy development related to drones. On the other hand, the lack of specificity in the agenda may limit the ability for businesses to prepare effectively.

Consumers and community members may appreciate the ability to observe the meeting, yet they might feel marginalized due to the inability to present oral comments and the unclear process for submitting written input.

Conclusion

The FAA's initiative to involve the public and industry stakeholders in discussions on drone integration reflects a positive step towards inclusive policy-making. However, enhancing the clarity and transparency of the meeting process, particularly concerning public participation and feedback, would strengthen trust and ensure broader engagement. In doing so, the FAA can foster a more collaborative environment that incorporates diverse perspectives into its decision-making process.