FR 2021-01810

Overview

Title

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies Extension of Comment Period

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Reserve System wants to give people more time to share their thoughts about one bank buying another. Now, everyone has until February 22, 2021, to send in their opinions, and they can do this by writing letters or going online!

Summary AI

The Federal Reserve System has announced an extension of the comment period for an application involving the formation or acquisition of bank holding companies. The application in question concerns First Citizens BancShares, Inc., located in Raleigh, North Carolina, acquiring CIT Group, Inc., based in New York, New York. The public is invited to express their views in writing about this application, with the new deadline for submissions set for February 22, 2021. The information is accessible for review at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and through specified online resources.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7292
Document #: 2021-01810
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7292-7292

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The Federal Reserve System has issued a notice regarding an extension of the comment period for an application involving the formation or acquisition of bank holding companies. Specifically, the notice pertains to First Citizens BancShares, Inc. of Raleigh, North Carolina's proposal to acquire CIT Group, Inc. of New York, New York, which includes acquiring CIT Bank, National Association, based in Pasadena, California. Members of the public are invited to submit their written comments on this proposal by February 22, 2021. Information pertaining to the application is available for public inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, and online through designated resources.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues and concerns in this document:

  1. Lack of Transparency on "Good Cause": The document mentions that the comment period has been extended "for good cause," yet it does not specify what constitutes this good cause. This lack of detailed explanation may appear opaque to the public.

  2. Complex Legal References: The notice assumes a degree of familiarity with legal statutes such as the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and Regulation Y, which could be difficult for individuals who are not versed in banking law to understand. References such as "12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq." are likely to confuse readers unfamiliar with legal citations.

  3. Dispersed Contact Information: The contact information for submitting comments or requesting further information is spread across different sections and formats, potentially complicating the process for those wishing to participate.

  4. Limited Explanation of Relevant Standards: The standards enumerated in the Bank Holding Company Act are mentioned but not elaborated upon, which may require interested parties to conduct additional research to understand the criteria against which the application is judged.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document represents an opportunity to engage with the regulatory processes that oversee significant banking transactions. Public participation and commentary are crucial as they offer perspectives and concerns that may influence regulatory decisions. However, the complexity of the legal references and scattered information may deter some individuals from providing input.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Banks and Financial Institutions: They may view this document and the extension as a chance to align their strategies and potentially adjust their competitive approaches based on the anticipated merger.

  • Shareholders and Investors: These stakeholders might scrutinize the document to assess the potential impacts of the acquisition on shareholder value and market dynamics.

  • Consumers of Banking Services: Although indirectly affected, consumers might be concerned about how such acquisitions could alter the landscape of banking services, potentially affecting competition, service availability, and pricing.

In summary, while the document invites public participation and transparency around a significant financial acquisition, the complexity and presentation could be improved to ensure broader understanding and involvement.

Issues

  • • The document mentions that the comment period has been extended 'for good cause,' but does not specify what constitutes good cause, which may lack transparency.

  • • The notice refers to the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)) without providing any summary or details, which might be difficult for a layperson to understand without further research.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with legal statutes (e.g., Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, Regulation Y), which could be complex for individuals not versed in banking law.

  • • The contact information is spread across different sections and formats, making it somewhat difficult to follow for someone looking to submit feedback or requests.

  • • The language relating to the process for submitting comments (online or by mail) could be more direct and clearly outlined to aid understanding.

  • • The use of legal references such as '12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.' might be confusing to readers unfamiliar with legal citations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 419
Sentences: 13
Entities: 48

Language

Nouns: 149
Verbs: 31
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.09
Average Sentence Length:
32.23
Token Entropy:
4.80
Readability (ARI):
22.25

Reading Time

about a minute or two