FR 2021-01807

Overview

Title

Solicitation for Annual Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is offering a prize of up to $50,000 to people or groups who come up with great ideas to stop bad guys from using transport systems to sell or kidnap people. The contest is open to folks in the U.S., and the best ideas can win money to help make them happen.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of Transportation is hosting the annual Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award, which aims to encourage creative and effective ways to raise awareness and prevent human trafficking in the transportation industry. Open to individuals and various organizations, including NGOs and government bodies, the award offers a cash prize of up to $50,000 for the most impactful project. Participants must be U.S. citizens or entities based in the U.S., and submissions are due by March 1, 2021. Winners will be judged based on factors such as technical merit, originality, impact, and practicality.

Abstract

The annual Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award (the award) incentivizes an increase in human trafficking awareness, training, and prevention among transportation stakeholders. The award is a component of the Department's Transportation Leaders Against Human Trafficking initiative. Additional information regarding the Department's counter-trafficking activities can be found at www.transportation.gov/stophumantrafficking. The award serves as a platform for transportation stakeholders to unlock their creativity, and to empower them to develop impactful and innovative counter-trafficking tools, initiatives, campaigns, and technologies that can help defeat this heinous crime. The award is open to individuals and entities, including non-governmental organizations, transportation industry associations, research institutions, and State and local government organizations. Entrants compete for a cash award of up to $50,000 to be awarded to the individual(s) or entity selected for creating the most impactful counter-trafficking initiative or technology. The U.S. Department of Transportation intends to incentivize individuals and entities to think creatively in developing innovative solutions to combat human trafficking in the transportation industry, and to share those innovations with the broader community.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7454
Document #: 2021-01807
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7454-7456

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register, titled "Solicitation for Annual Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award," serves to announce the U.S. Department of Transportation's annual award aimed at incentivizing innovative solutions to combat human trafficking in the transportation industry. This initiative is part of the broader Transportation Leaders Against Human Trafficking initiative, focusing on raising awareness, training, and preventive measures against human trafficking. Participants can compete for a cash award of up to $50,000. The award is open to U.S. citizens and entities based in the United States, including NGOs, industry associations, and governmental bodies. Entries are judged based on several criteria, including originality and impact, with submissions due by March 1, 2021.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document raises several concerns that warrant attention:

  • Prize Amount Ambiguity: Although the cash prize is stated as "up to $50,000," there is no stated rubric for how the amount will be allocated, which could lead to perceptions of arbitrary decision-making and lack of transparency in the award process.

  • Vague Terminology: Terms such as "substantially similar" and "original" are not well-defined within the rules, leaving room for subjective interpretation. This could lead to disputes or dissatisfaction among participants regarding eligibility and evaluation.

  • Survivor Input: The document acknowledges consultation with human trafficking survivors but does not specify how their insights will influence the evaluation process. Their role in shaping or validating solutions is critical and should be more explicitly integrated to enhance the legitimacy and authenticity of the projects.

  • Indemnity Clause: Participants are required to indemnify the federal government from certain legal claims, which could deter potential applicants due to fear of financial liability. Clearer terms and reassurances would benefit participants who may lack legal resources.

  • Intellectual Property Concerns: The rules concerning intellectual property are complex and might be intimidating for individuals not familiar with legal jargon. Simplified language or guidance could facilitate broader participation.

  • Implementation Support: Beyond the financial prize, the document does not elaborate on additional support for implementing the proposed projects. This limitation could hinder the practical impact of even the most innovative solutions.

  • Complex Legal Terms: Terms like "demonstration license" and "perpetuity" regarding the use of submissions are outlined without clear examples or simpler explanations, potentially intimidating or misguiding participants.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the initiative can positively influence awareness and actions against human trafficking by leveraging the transportation sector's pivotal role in combating this crime. It encourages innovative ideas and collaboration among diverse stakeholders, including private enterprises and government agencies, thereby fostering a broader societal impact.

Specific stakeholders such as NGOs, industry associations, and government bodies stand to benefit significantly from this initiative. It provides them with not only potential financial resources but also a platform to showcase their work on a national scale. However, the aforementioned concerns, particularly around legal liability and intellectual property, might present barriers to full participation.

In summary, while the Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award holds promise for generating impactful solutions, addressing issues of ambiguity, legal complexity, and post-award support could significantly enhance its efficacy and reach among intended participants.

Financial Assessment

The document under review pertains to the annual Combating Human Trafficking in Transportation Impact Award, primarily focused on incentivizing impactful and innovative solutions to human trafficking within the transportation industry. A key financial element of this initiative is the offering of a cash award of up to $50,000 to the individual or entity deemed to have created the most impactful project.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The award consists of a cash prize reaching up to $50,000. This sum is earmarked for the entity or individual responsible for developing the most effective counter-trafficking solution. The criteria for determining the exact amount within this range are not explicitly disclosed, which could pose issues related to transparency and fairness in the selection process.

Financial References Relating to Identified Issues

A notable issue with the financial aspect is the unspecified criteria for awarding up to $50,000. This lack of specificity regarding how the prize amount is determined can lead to perceptions of favoritism or lack of transparency. Without clear guidelines on how the amount is allocated, potential participants may question the objectivity of the evaluation process.

Additionally, the document does not outline how the cash award ensures the practical implementation of the proposed solutions. While the $50,000 prize is significant, the lack of resources or support mechanisms beyond the cash award could limit the actual impact or scalability of the projects. Effective use of the prize money might require additional planning or support that goes beyond the initial financial allocation, but this is not addressed in the document.

Furthermore, the mention of potential financial liabilities related to indemnifying the Federal Government might deter some participants due to the financial risks involved. This aspect, coupled with the complexities of intellectual property rights, could overshadow the appeal of the cash award.

In conclusion, while the $50,000 cash award is intended to motivate and reward creativity and innovation in combatting human trafficking, clarity around allocation criteria, and additional implementation support, could enhance the overall effectiveness and transparency of the initiative.

Issues

  • • The document mentions a cash award of up to $50,000 but does not provide specific criteria for deciding the amount within this range, which could lead to perceptions of favoritism or lack of transparency.

  • • The use of the phrase 'substantially similar' in the rules related to disqualifications and eligibility could be seen as vague, as what constitutes 'substantially similar' is not clearly defined.

  • • There is no specific definition provided for what qualifies as an 'original' idea, which might lead to subjective evaluations during judging.

  • • The document only briefly mentions consulting survivors of human trafficking but doesn't specify how their input will be weighed in the evaluation process, which might reduce perceived efficacy or authenticity of the projects.

  • • The statement concerning indemnity ('Entrants must indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Federal Government...') may dissuade potential participants due to potential financial liabilities without clearer terms.

  • • The language in the rules about intellectual property rights ('The entry does not and will not violate or infringe upon the intellectual property rights, privacy rights, publicity rights, or other legal rights of any third party') could be challenging for applicants unfamiliar with intellectual property law.

  • • The document does not specify how the potential winners will be supported in implementing their proposed solutions beyond the cash prize, which could limit the practical impact of even awarded projects.

  • • Terms such as 'demonstration license' and 'perpetuity' regarding the use of the entrants' names and submissions may appear overly complex or intimidating without additional clarification or examples.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,534
Sentences: 96
Entities: 104

Language

Nouns: 770
Verbs: 211
Adjectives: 165
Adverbs: 34
Numbers: 59

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.26
Average Sentence Length:
26.40
Token Entropy:
5.60
Readability (ARI):
20.17

Reading Time

about 9 minutes