FR 2021-01677

Overview

Title

Certain Uncoated Paper From Portugal: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Commerce found out that some paper from Portugal was being sold in the U.S. for too cheap, which isn't fair to the people making paper here; so they decided to add extra costs, called duties, to make it fair again.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has determined that certain uncoated paper from Portugal was sold in the U.S. at prices below usual value from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019. As a result, the department calculated specific antidumping duties for different importers based on the dumping margin observed. These duties are intended to address unfair pricing and aim to maintain fair competition. The Federal Register notice also outlines the process for assessing these duties and the required actions from importers to ensure compliance.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Portugal was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) March 1, 2018 through February 28, 2019.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7269
Document #: 2021-01677
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7269-7270

AnalysisAI

The document in question is an official notice from the Department of Commerce concerning the results of an administrative review regarding antidumping duties on certain uncoated paper imported from Portugal between March 2018 and February 2019. The document determines that this paper was sold in the United States at prices below the normal value, leading to the imposition of antidumping duties meant to counteract unfair pricing and foster fair competition.

Summary of the Document

In essence, the Department of Commerce has reviewed and confirmed that uncoated paper from Portugal was sold at slashed prices, lower than what is considered the normal market value. This finding has prompted the calculation of specific antidumping duties for various importers. The notice provides details on how these duties are to be assessed and managed, although it does not disclose the exact figures or methodologies applied. The document outlines subsequent steps, deadlines, and procedural requirements for importers and other stakeholders to comply with these findings.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Complex Language and Structure:
The document is structured with a significant amount of technical jargon, such as terms like "antidumping duties" and "weighted-average dumping margin." This complexity may hinder understanding for readers unfamiliar with trade law or government procedures. Additionally, the frequent references to memorandums and results without clear summaries create challenges for readers to grasp the full picture without additional context.

Transparency and Accessibility:
While the notice mentions changes made since preliminary results, such as adjustments to costs for The Navigator Company, S.A., it falls short of providing detailed numerical results or comprehensive explanations, which could limit transparency. The document also relies heavily on electronic systems like ACCESS for further information, potentially restricting access to individuals without the necessary registration or technical skills.

Heavy Reliance on Cross-References:
There is substantial reliance on cross-referencing other documents, which may prove cumbersome for individuals who want to understand the complete scope and details without accessing multiple sources.

Impact on the Public

Broad Public Impact:
For the wider public, this document illustrates the government's role in monitoring and regulating international trade to ensure fair competition. Although it might not directly affect everyday consumer choices, it accentuates the importance of protective measures in maintaining market fairness.

Specific Stakeholder Impact:
The consequences of this document are more directly felt by importers and the companies involved in the sale of Portugal’s uncoated paper. For importers, the imposition of antidumping duties translates to higher costs, potentially impacting pricing strategies and profit margins. Meanwhile, domestic producers of uncoated paper may benefit from a level playing field in which they are not undercut by international competitors selling at artificially low prices.

Conclusion

This Federal Register notice represents a critical component of trade policy and enforcement. However, its accessibility to the general public is potentially hindered by technical language, procedural complexity, and the need for additional referenced materials to fully understand the outcomes. Its primary impact is on the industry stakeholders engaged in international trade with Portugal, aiming ultimately to uphold fair competition and protect domestic industries from unfair international practices.

Issues

  • • The document contains several references to memorandums and results without clearly summarizing their conclusions, which can make it difficult for a reader unfamiliar with the specifics of the case to fully understand the content.

  • • The language used in describing the procedural extensions and tolling of deadlines is complex and contains technical jargon that may not be easily understood by all readers.

  • • The document discusses calculations involving dumping margins and cash deposit requirements but does not provide the specific numerical results or the methodology, which may limit transparency and understanding.

  • • There is a reliance on electronic systems like ACCESS for viewing documents, which could be a barrier for individuals without the necessary access or technical skills.

  • • The document is heavily reliant on cross-references to other documents, which may be inconvenient for those wishing to comprehend the full context without accessing additional materials.

  • • Some specific calculations and adjustments made (such as for post-sale price adjustments and costs for The Navigator Company, S.A.) are mentioned without detailed explanation or supporting data within this document.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with specific legal and administrative terms and processes related to antidumping duties, which might not be accessible to general readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,843
Sentences: 60
Entities: 133

Language

Nouns: 595
Verbs: 116
Adjectives: 98
Adverbs: 30
Numbers: 110

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.63
Average Sentence Length:
30.72
Token Entropy:
5.50
Readability (ARI):
24.02

Reading Time

about 7 minutes