FR 2021-01676

Overview

Title

Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Department of Commerce found out that some paper from Brazil was sold in the U.S. for cheaper than it should have been, so they are going to charge extra fees, called antidumping duties, to make things fair. This means that two Brazilian paper companies will have to pay more money when they sell paper to the U.S. in the future.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has determined that certain uncoated paper from Brazil was sold in the U.S. at less than its normal value during the review period from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019. As a result, antidumping duties will be assessed on these imports, with specific rates calculated for each company involved. International Paper and Suzano Papel e Celulose S.A., two companies affected, will have rates based on their sales and entered values. New cash deposit requirements will apply to all future shipments of the merchandise covered by this review.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Brazil was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), March 1, 2018 through February 28, 2019.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7254
Document #: 2021-01676
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7254-7255

AnalysisAI

The document under review is an official notice from the Department of Commerce regarding the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review for uncoated paper imported from Brazil. This review period covers sales from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019. The notice reveals that the paper was sold in the United States at prices lower than what is considered normal, identifying an instance of dumping. Consequently, antidumping duties will be imposed on these imports.

Summary of the Document

At its core, the document establishes that Brazilian uncoated paper was being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This triggers the implementation of antidumping duties intended to level the playing field for domestic producers by making imported goods more expensive to offset the dumping margin. The notice provides data on company-specific duties imposed on the two main entities involved, International Paper and Suzano Papel e Celulose S.A., alongside instructions for the assessment of these duties.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document contains a fair amount of technical language specific to international trade law, which might be intimidating or confusing for individuals without a background in this area. Furthermore, it relies heavily on external memoranda for the details of its decisions, necessitating outside research for a comprehensive understanding.

Another concern is the potential ambiguity in the instructions for importers regarding compliance with cash deposit requirements. Clarity in this area is crucial to prevent unintentional non-compliance, which could result in additional duties being assessed.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the actions taken in this document may seem distant but can have upstream effects on prices or availability of certain paper products, potentially influencing the cost of paper goods for consumers. Domestically, these antidumping duties aim to protect American manufacturers from being undercut by foreign competitors dumping products at less than fair value, which may help sustain jobs in the paper industry.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Domestic Producers: The imposition of antidumping duties is likely seen as a positive by American paper manufacturers. It helps ensure fair competition and protect jobs within the industry.

Importers and Foreign Exporters: For foreign exporters like the Brazilian companies named, these duties are likely to create challenges by increasing costs, impacting their competitiveness in the U.S. market. Importers in the U.S. might face more stringent requirements and potential financial liabilities if they fail to comply with the new deposit rules.

Consumers: There might be indirect effects on consumers if importers pass on the costs associated with antidumping duties by raising prices of paper products. However, the direct effect on average consumers may be minimal unless they are part of industries that heavily depend on paper.

Overall, while aimed at correcting unfair trade practices, the implementation of these duties requires careful consideration of its ripple effects across various stakeholders involved in the trade and use of uncoated paper.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical and legal jargon related to antidumping duties, which might be difficult for a general reader to understand without background knowledge in international trade law.

  • • There is no explicit breakdown of costs or financial implications for the actions described, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The document is heavily reliant on external memorandums and references (e.g., 'Issues and Decision Memorandum'), which are not included within the text, thus requiring additional research to fully understand the decisions and changes.

  • • The instructions for importers regarding the cash deposit requirements and the consequences for failing to comply could be made clearer to ensure understanding and compliance.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,943
Sentences: 67
Entities: 143

Language

Nouns: 638
Verbs: 128
Adjectives: 102
Adverbs: 34
Numbers: 112

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.62
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
5.52
Readability (ARI):
23.11

Reading Time

about 7 minutes