FR 2021-01659

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is telling people about changes some gas companies want to make to the money they charge. They want to keep everyone informed and let people know how they can speak up if they have any concerns.

Summary AI

The document contains a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission about several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. Various companies, including Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC and National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, have made filings that involve tariff adjustments and rate changes. The filings are accessible through the Commission's eLibrary system, and any interested parties must file any interventions or protests by specific deadlines. This notice is meant to keep the public informed about these regulatory proceedings and how they can participate if desired.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7285
Document #: 2021-01659
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7285-7286

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is an official notice regarding several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. This notice, published in the Federal Register, involves multiple companies such as Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC, and details various tariff adjustments and rate changes.

Summary of the Document

In essence, this document lists the filings made by different natural gas companies, each identified by a unique docket number. These filings pertain to changes in tariff rates, service agreements, and adjustments necessary for compliance with existing regulations. Interested parties are invited to intervene or protest these filings by specific deadlines, indicating that the document serves a procedural purpose in the regulatory process.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several concerns highlighted by the document's structure and content:

  • Technical Language: The use of complex regulatory jargon and references to specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) could make it challenging for the general public to fully comprehend the implications of these filings. Without a background in law or energy regulation, readers may struggle to understand the significance of terms like "§ 4(d) Rate Filing" or "Form(s) of Service Agmt GMS Updates."

  • Lack of Financial Details: The document does not delve into the financial impacts of the proposed rate changes and adjustments. Stakeholders, including consumers, may be concerned about potential cost implications or savings resulting from these filings but are not provided with such insights.

  • Transparency in Changes: There is no explanation given for why certain implementations, such as the "Bistineau Transportation Service" or the cancellation of Rate Schedule X-1, are necessary. This absence of context could lead to concerns about the transparency and rationale behind these regulatory changes.

Broad Impact on the Public

For the public, this document represents yet another layer of complexity in understanding how energy regulations could affect their daily lives. Rate changes in natural gas pipelines could have downstream effects on residential utility bills, business expenses, and more. However, the average consumer may not be aware of these potential impacts due to the technical nature of the notice.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Different stakeholders will experience varied impacts based on the changes detailed in the document:

  • Energy Companies: The primary stakeholders here are the companies involved in these filings. For them, this is part of the standard regulatory process which could either increase or decrease their operational costs depending on the outcome of these filings.

  • Regulatory Bodies: FERC and related regulatory agencies are critical stakeholders, as they will oversee the process, ensuring compliance with regulations and considering any protests or interventions filed.

  • Consumer Groups: While not directly involved in the filing process, consumer advocacy groups may choose to intervene if they see potential disadvantages for the public, such as increased energy prices or unfair rates.

In conclusion, while this FERC document is essential for maintaining transparency and accountability in energy regulation, its technical nature and lack of financial specifics may limit public understanding and engagement. Stakeholders with vested interests will need to navigate this regulatory landscape with a focus on compliance and advocacy to protect or advance their interests.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical and regulatory language, which may be complex and difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on the financial implications or impact of the rate filings and tariff changes, which might be necessary for a comprehensive audit on potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no explanation of why the changes or implementations such as the 'Bistineau Transportation Service' or 'Cancellation of Rate Schedule X-1' are necessary, which could raise concerns about transparency.

  • • The document refers to various CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) sections without explaining them, which could hinder understanding for those not familiar with regulatory terms.

  • • No specific details are provided about how these filings might impact consumers or different stakeholders, potential price changes, or service delivery.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 842
Sentences: 65
Entities: 110

Language

Nouns: 275
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 104

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.16
Average Sentence Length:
12.95
Token Entropy:
4.48
Readability (ARI):
16.57

Reading Time

about 2 minutes