FR 2021-01578

Overview

Title

Rules of Practice and Procedure; Adjusting Civil Money Penalties for Inflation

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation has updated their money penalties to keep up with price changes over time. Now, if someone breaks the rules, they might have to pay up to $217 each day, starting from things they did wrong back in late 2015.

Summary AI

The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) has issued a final rule to update the civil money penalties they can impose, adjusting them for inflation. This adjustment is required by a 2015 law that aims to keep penalties effective by considering inflation. The regulation specifies that for any violations related to the Farm Credit Act, fines can increase to a maximum of $217 per day. The new penalty rates will apply to violations assessed on or after January 15, 2021, for conduct dating back to November 2, 2015.

Abstract

This rule implements inflation adjustments to civil money penalties (CMPs) that the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) may impose under the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended. These adjustments are required by 2015 amendments to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990.

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 8854
Document #: 2021-01578
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8854-8854

AnalysisAI

The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) has released a final rule regarding adjustments to civil money penalties (CMPs) due to inflation. This change is driven by the 2015 amendments to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act. Essentially, this regulation ensures that penalties remain effective by periodically adjusting for the cost of living as measured by inflation. Specifically, the rule mentions that penalties related to violations of the Farm Credit Act can reach a maximum of $217 per day. This updated penalty rate applies to violations assessed from January 15, 2021, onwards.

Summary of the Document

The document at hand updates and refines the penalties imposed by FCSIC for specific violations concerning the Farm Credit Act of 1971. The incorporation of inflation adjustments reflects an overall trend to maintain the relevance and deterrent power of civil penalties in light of changing economic conditions. The necessity and methodology for these adjustments are framed by legislation set forth in 2015, with no room for discretion or alteration by the agencies involved.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue with the document is the lack of detailed direction regarding the specific penalties for different types of violations under sections 5.65(c) and (d). By only specifying the maximum daily penalty, there is potential ambiguity in enforcement or understanding by those subject to these penalties. Furthermore, the process used for future adjustments to penalties—except for the requirement that they occur annually—is not elaborated upon, potentially leading to confusion for stakeholders required to comply. The document also includes statutory language that may be challenging for readers not versed in legal terminology, suggesting a need for clearer explanations or examples. Lastly, the footnotes defining CMPs could benefit from providing more detailed context or examples in the main text rather than relegating them to the footnotes.

Impact on the General Public

Broadly, this document signals an intention for stricter enforcement and higher financial repercussions for non-compliance with certain regulations under the Farm Credit Act. For the average citizen, this move might underscore the importance of accountability and compliance across financial systems. Although these penalties directly affect specific entities and individuals rather than the general populace, a transparent and effective penalty system contributes to maintaining trust in regulatory oversight.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For banks and individuals working within the Farm Credit System, these regulation changes signify a notable shift. Institutions that might be fined under these rules face higher financial stakes, necessitating increased vigilance to ensure compliance and avoid accumulating daily penalties. While the adjustments may align with inflation trends and aim to preserve deterrent effects, they could impose additional financial burdens on those found in violation. Conversely, stakeholders vested in maintaining rigorous accountability within the financial system might find such measures reassuring, as they signal a commitment to uphold legislative and regulatory standards.

In summary, while the document sets forth necessary updates, its lack of detailed examples, as well as technical language, might require further clarification for effective comprehension and application.

Financial Assessment

The Federal Register document discusses the implementation of inflation adjustments for civil money penalties (CMPs) used under the Farm Credit Act of 1971. The adjustments are mandated by amendments to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 and are aimed at maintaining the deterrent effect of these penalties.

Summary of Financial Adjustments

The document explains that civil money penalties are adjusted annually to account for inflation. Prior to the adjustment described in the document, the maximum penalty for certain violations was $214 per day. This document outlines a small increase in this maximum penalty to $217 per day, reflecting an inflation adjustment.

Relationship to Identified Issues

  1. Non-Specific Penalty Amounts: The document indicates the maximum fine per violation is $217 per day but does not elaborate on specific penalties for different kinds of violations within the scope of sections 5.65(c) and (d) of the Farm Credit Act. This might create some ambiguity in enforcement because the penalties could be viewed as uniform regardless of the nature or severity of the violation.

  2. Lack of Future Adjustment Methodology: While the document mandates annual adjustments aligned with inflation, it does not offer detailed methodologies or examples for how these changes will be computed in coming years. The increase from $214 to $217 is based on a specific inflation multiplier for that year. However, without detailed predictive guidance, stakeholders may find it challenging to anticipate financial obligations in the future.

  3. Complex Legal Language: The term "civil money penalty" (CMP) and its adjustment mechanisms may be difficult for individuals to grasp without context. The document uses specific legal and statutory language to describe the adjustments, which could benefit from clarification. Offering examples or simpler explanations about how inflation adjustments affect CMPs could address this issue, particularly the adjustment from $214 to $217.

Clarity and Understanding

The adjustments made to the penalties reflect a commitment to keeping fines relevant and effective as deterrents by considering changes in economic conditions, such as inflation. Nonetheless, the lack of detailed explanation on penalty calculation and adjustment methodologies may contribute to confusion among those subject to these penalties, especially if they are unfamiliar with the annual use of the Consumer Price Index as a basis for adjustment. Clear, jargon-free communication would greatly aid in enhancing public understanding and compliance.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the exact penalties for different violations under section 5.65(c) and (d) other than the maximum amount per day, which might lead to ambiguity in enforcement.

  • • The rule summarizes the mandate to adjust penalties by inflation annually but does not provide future specific methods or examples of how these adjustments will be calculated year-on-year, potentially leading to confusion.

  • • The language regarding the non-discretionary nature of penalty adjustments might be difficult to understand for individuals not familiar with statutory terms, possibly benefiting from clearer explanation or examples.

  • • The footnote about the definition of a civil money penalty (CMP) refers to statutory requirements but could be made clearer by providing more detailed examples or context within the document text itself.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 1,320
Sentences: 38
Entities: 146

Language

Nouns: 413
Verbs: 96
Adjectives: 55
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 117

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.59
Average Sentence Length:
34.74
Token Entropy:
5.28
Readability (ARI):
20.94

Reading Time

about 5 minutes