FR 2021-01528

Overview

Title

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Veterans Affairs is making changes to how they handle certain kinds of information about veterans, like making sure it's kept safe and updating how long they keep it. They're doing this to make better plans and decisions for helping veterans.

Summary AI

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is updating an existing system of records related to non-health data. This update will reflect changes to routine uses, safeguards, retention and disposal procedures, as well as system management details. It involves modifying contact information and policies to ensure data security and compliance with federal regulations. The amendments aim to improve how the VA manages and uses data to support planning and policy decisions for veterans' services.

Abstract

As required by the Privacy Act of 1974, notice is hereby given that the Department of Veterans Affairs is amending the system of records currently entitled "Non-Health Data Analyses and Projections for VA Policy and Planning-VA (149VA008A)" as set forth in the Federal Register. VA is amending this system notice serves to reflect amendments to the amendments to the Routine Uses of Records Maintained in the System, Safeguards, Retention and Disposal, and System Manager and Address as well as Notification Procedure. VA is republishing the system notice in its entirety.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 6985
Document #: 2021-01528
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 6985-6988

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document is an official notice from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announcing amendments to an existing system of records. This system, named "Non-Health Data Analyses and Projections for VA Policy and Planning-VA (149VA008A)," is being updated in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974. The amendments involve modifications to routine uses, data security safeguards, records retention and disposal processes, and the system management structure. These changes are intended to enhance the management and usage of data, ensuring that the VA can effectively plan and implement policies to improve services for veterans and their families.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One issue with the document is its reliance on references to various offices and policies within the VA, such as the Office of Enterprise Integration and directives on data security. This could lead to confusion for individuals who are not familiar with the VA's internal workings. Additionally, the language used to describe the routine uses of records, especially in the context of data breaches and litigation, is complex and may not be easily understood by the average reader.

The document also includes detailed lists of categories and examples that make certain sections overly dense, potentially obscuring key information. Furthermore, it uses technical jargon and acronyms, like NIST-verified FIPS standards, without sufficient explanation. This can be off-putting or unclear to readers who lack technical expertise.

Broader Public Impact

For the general public, this document primarily serves as an assurance that the VA is taking steps to secure and properly manage non-health-related data. Readers may appreciate knowing that the VA is updating its processes to better protect data privacy and comply with federal standards. However, the complexity of the document may impede the general understanding of these efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Veterans and their families, as key stakeholders, stand to benefit from the improved data management and security practices outlined in this document. The amendments aim to help the VA enhance its services and policymaking efforts, which could lead to better programs and support for veterans.

On the other hand, individuals and organizations dealing with the VA, such as contractors and other federal agencies, may be affected by the new data handling and security requirements. These stakeholders will need to ensure compliance with updated standards, potentially involving additional resources or adjustments in their operations.

Overall, while the document outlines needed updates to safeguard veteran data and improve service delivery, its complexity and reliance on technical language may present challenges for those trying to grasp the specifics of the changes implemented.

Issues

  • • The document contains numerous references to various offices and policies within the VA (such as the Office of Enterprise Integration, Directive 6513, and VA Handbook 6500), which could potentially be confusing to readers unfamiliar with VA's internal structure and policies.

  • • The language regarding the routine uses of records, especially those related to data breaches and litigation, is complex and may be difficult for the average reader to fully understand.

  • • The long lists of examples within categories, such as 'Categories of Records in the System,' make the text dense and could obfuscate important information.

  • • The inclusion of detailed contact information for multiple individuals and addresses might be unnecessary for the primary purpose of informing about the system of records.

  • • The explanation of policies for storage, retrievability, retention, disposal, and safeguards is heavily reliant on technical jargon and references to acronyms and standards (e.g., NIST-verified FIPS 140-2) that may not be clear to all readers.

  • • The document occasionally uses passive voice, which can make it difficult to determine who is responsible for certain actions, particularly in sections describing amendments and policy implementations.

  • • The reference to an external OMB memoranda guidance (1985 Privacy Act Guidance—Update) without sufficient context or direct excerpt might require the reader to perform additional research, which could lead to misunderstandings.

  • • The document does not clearly outline the specific changes made in this amendment compared to previous iterations, making it difficult for a reader to discern what has been updated or newly added.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 3,747
Sentences: 122
Entities: 272

Language

Nouns: 1,344
Verbs: 300
Adjectives: 199
Adverbs: 42
Numbers: 97

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.97
Average Sentence Length:
30.71
Token Entropy:
5.67
Readability (ARI):
21.10

Reading Time

about 14 minutes