FR 2021-01522

The document under discussion is a notice published by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), a part of the Department of Transportation. The notice invites public comments on a special permit application from the El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (EPNG). This permit seeks to provide an exemption from specific federal pipeline safety regulations related to changes in class location and maximum allowable operating pressure for a segment of their pipeline located in Ward County, Texas. Comments on the proposal must be submitted by February 24, 2021, and the decision will be based on a thorough evaluation of all received feedback.

General Summary

In brief, the notice serves to inform the public about EPNG's request to deviate from existing pipeline safety rules for a specific pipeline segment. PHMSA, responsible for overseeing such safety measures, solicits public input to decide whether granting this permit is justified. The document outlines the formal process for submitting comments and details where to send any confidential business information.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document's content and structure. Firstly, it does not thoroughly explain why EPNG seeks this special permit, which could raise questions about the company's motives or any potential risks involved. This lack of transparency might make it harder for individuals unfamiliar with the regulatory framework to provide meaningful input.

Additionally, the text includes specific technical details and references to regulatory codes, like 49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d) and § 192.619(a), which could limit public understanding and engagement. This complexity might deter individuals from participating in the comment process, as it requires knowledge not typically possessed by the general public.

Furthermore, the potential environmental and safety impacts are mentioned only superficially. Stakeholders, such as local residents or environmental groups, might be concerned about the implications of granting such a special permit without a clear explanation of the potential risks and benefits.

Broader Public Impact

From a broader perspective, this notice might garner attention from individuals residing near the affected pipeline segment, as they could be directly impacted by any changes in safety measures. The lack of clear information might lead to concern or opposition from those who prioritize safety and environmental protection over regulatory flexibility for a corporation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For EPNG, obtaining the requested permit could be economically advantageous, allowing for cost savings by avoiding the need for expensive measures like pipe replacement or pressure reduction. However, this financial benefit could be viewed critically if perceived as prioritizing profit over safety.

Local communities and advocacy groups might view this permit request with skepticism, especially if the potential risks are not adequately addressed. Without a solid understanding of how safety and environmental considerations are being managed, these stakeholders might question the decision-making process and the potential impacts on safety standards.

Conclusion

In summary, the notice raises important questions about transparency, public participation, and the balance between economic benefits and safety. While it serves as a formal invitation for public commentary, the technical language and lack of detail may inadvertently limit meaningful engagement, particularly from those without specialized knowledge. PHMSA's evaluation and decision will need to carefully consider not only the technical and economic aspects but also the public's environmental and safety concerns.