FR 2021-01486

Overview

Title

National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research is having a secret meeting to talk about which projects should get money for research. They keep it secret so they don't accidentally share private information, but this means people can't see how they decide who gets the money.

Summary AI

The National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research is holding a closed meeting for the NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee on February 18-19, 2021. The purpose of the meeting is to review and evaluate grant applications. It will be a virtual meeting conducted from the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD. The meeting is closed to the public because it involves discussions that could disclose confidential information or invade personal privacy.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 6891
Document #: 2021-01486
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 6891-6891

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, an entity under the Health and Human Services Department and the National Institutes of Health. It announces a closed meeting for the NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee, which is scheduled to occur over the course of two days, from February 18 to February 19, 2021. The meeting is set to review and evaluate grant applications and will take place virtually from a location within the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland.

Summary of the Document

The notice specifies that the meeting will be closed to the public due to the nature of the discussions, which could reveal confidential trade secrets, patentable materials, or personal information that could constitute an invasion of privacy. The document provides essential details such as the name of the committee, the date and time of the meeting, the agenda, and the contact information for the responsible person. However, the purpose of the meeting — to review and evaluate grant applications — is clearly stated.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document. First, the decision to close the meeting to the public is a significant point of concern, which can be seen as a limitation on transparency and accountability. Although the rationale for this decision is provided, namely the protection of confidential information, it nonetheless restricts public scrutiny.

Moreover, the document does not outline the specific criteria or methodology that will be used to evaluate the grant applications. This lack of detail may lead to concerns about fairness or potential bias in the grant review process.

The language used to describe potentially disclosable information, such as "confidential trade secrets or commercial property," is vague and lacks specificity. This could lead to misunderstandings about the nature of the information being protected.

Furthermore, the contact information provided, while including an email address, does not offer a website or any additional resources that the public might use to seek more information. This lack of further resources might limit public engagement or inquiry.

Lastly, the notice states the meeting will take place in a specific room at the National Institutes of Health as well as virtually. Without clear instructions on how to access the virtual meeting, this dual-location mention could create confusion.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the general public, the closed nature of the meeting may feel as though transparency around the grant allocation process is being compromised. Citizens who have an interest in how public funds are distributed, particularly in the field of health research, might be concerned by the lack of accessible information.

For stakeholders directly involved in or impacted by the grant applications, including researchers and institutions, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria could raise concerns regarding the transparency of the decision-making process.

On a positive note, the closed meeting could safeguard sensitive information that, if disclosed, might harm individual privacy or commercial interests. This protective measure may be appreciated by applicants and entities with proprietary information included in their submissions.

In summary, while the notice fulfills a procedural requirement and seeks to protect sensitive information, the issues of transparency and accessibility linger, impacting public perception and stakeholder trust.

Issues

  • • The meeting is closed to the public, which limits transparency and accountability, even though it is stated that this is to protect confidential information.

  • • The notice does not provide details on the criteria or methodology for the grant application evaluation, which could lead to concerns about fairness or bias.

  • • The term 'could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material' lacks specifics, potentially creating ambiguity.

  • • The contact information includes an email address but lacks a website or additional resources for further public inquiries.

  • • The meeting location is listed as both a specific room and a virtual meeting, which may be slightly confusing without further clarification on how the virtual meeting will be accessed.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 302
Sentences: 12
Entities: 37

Language

Nouns: 116
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.36
Average Sentence Length:
25.17
Token Entropy:
4.60
Readability (ARI):
19.55

Reading Time

about a minute or two